Cirque du Soleil on Broadway? — Page 13
Posted: 7/13/13 at 8:42pm
Posted: 7/13/13 at 8:44pm
Posted: 7/13/13 at 8:45pm
and right, LH? I missed this thread, haha.
Posted: 7/13/13 at 9:31pm
Updated On: 7/13/13 at 09:31 PM
Posted: 7/13/13 at 9:53pm
Updated On: 7/13/13 at 09:53 PM
Posted: 7/13/13 at 10:03pm
What other cuts have they made? I didn't hear about this!
Updated On: 7/13/13 at 10:03 PM
Posted: 7/13/13 at 10:21pm
Posted: 7/13/13 at 10:35pm
Tour destinations for OVO were cancelled (Seattle and Taipei)
By March 2013, 60 artists were let go
It is supposedly "confirmed" that Alegria will close for good in Madrid this December (Are you serious...)
LePage demanded that the Perches act in TOTEM was to be cut to tighten the show artistically
The high wire act in the recent show Amaluna was cut and the Unicycles act was supposedly cut as well. Vocal aerial hoops was replaced by regular Aerial Hoops
Cirque has decided to shorten down touring shows down to approximately 100 minutes for "artistic reasons". Intermission will still be done.
It's very likely that OVO will undergo a re-staging for the Japan tour starting soon
Updated On: 7/13/13 at 10:35 PM
Posted: 7/13/13 at 10:45pm
60 artists from Ovo or select artists were let go in various shows equaling 60 total?
Alegria...yeah...I heard that rumor, too. The show is also being billed as it's "20th and final year." It's pretty shocking. That'll be 20 years the show was on the road for.
I was wondering why the Perches act was cut! Now they have a new hand balancing act? Is this what replaced Perches?
Yeah...the high wire act left pretty quickly. And, correct me if I'm wrong, the Vocal Aerial Hoops was temporarily removed due to the artists being on maternity leave and the unicycles act is still in the show.
Again, correct me if I'm wrong, I believe all the touring shows have been cut down to 90 minutes with the 30 minute intermission = 2hrs 10min as opposed to the 2hrs 30min run time the touring shows had previously.
Yeah...Ovo needs a lot of work done. The concept was very weak to begin with, but it still could've worked if they had done it better (in my opinion).
Posted: 7/13/13 at 10:57pm
The last time I checked, Hand Balancing was a rotational act.
Yes, the artist left due to pregnancy, but I'm sure they could have found someone else to do the act. Not necessarily sure about Unicycle, that's what was "said"
I'm sure the intermissions are not 30 minutes long. The shows are to be performed in 100 minutes approx. itself
I'm glad I am not the only one who thinks so too. The concept was very weak to begin with. I never liked it.
I hope Julie Taymor will be apart of Cirque's creative team one day. A resident show in NY possibly? The creation and direction of Julie Taymor with Stephen Schwartz music and Cirque=dream Cirqur production
Updated On: 7/13/13 at 10:57 PM
Posted: 7/13/13 at 11:11pm
Yes...I completely agree. Bugs just aren't a theme that can hold a show. Especially not one that intends to internationally tour for a long long long time.
I'm sure Taymor will *hopefully* jump on the Cirque wagon soon. I wonder if maybe she was already reached out to for previous creations, but it fell through? I can't imagine reasons why Cirque wouldn't have offered something to her yet.
Posted: 7/13/13 at 11:21pm
I mean think about the story, especially the characters, and the point of it being a ROCK OPERA. It still confuses me
Updated On: 7/13/13 at 11:21 PM
Posted: 7/13/13 at 11:33pm
And honestly...I was pretty intrigued when I saw some of the first drawings of Zarkana. The name was fascinating and the concept was neat. However, to me, the show was literally just a big mess. It had potential, like Iris, but it just didn't live up to it...at all. And the baby is just flat out disturbing. I also think the show was too large and too projection heavy. I think the thing Cirque forgets is that projections often times make the performers seem much smaller. When you're on the MASSIVE Radio City Music Hall and Dolby Theatre stages, those projections screens take away A LOT of the beauty of the performers. I also think Cirque feels the need to cover up their performers and blend them into the scenery and design elements. However, the main focus should be the performers. They are stunning on their own and they don't need to be doused in a buttload of makeup and costume pieces. They just need a stage. Y'know?
Posted: 7/14/13 at 12:01am
Updated On: 7/14/13 at 12:01 AM
Posted: 7/14/13 at 12:11am

This is what I was saying about the human characters. For some reason, the male dancer's makeup reminds me a lot of the Phantom's makeup in the first act(but without the Phantom's lip...and mask)
Updated On: 7/14/13 at 12:11 AM
Posted: 7/14/13 at 2:50pm

Oh, I'm fine with the theatrical makeup. Especially stuff like the picture above. But, sometimes I feel they go a little overboard with the makeup.
Posted: 7/14/13 at 6:33pm
Posted: 7/14/13 at 6:34pm

I mean look at it...
Updated On: 7/14/13 at 06:34 PM
Posted: 7/14/13 at 7:01pm
And in response to your idea, I don't think they would ever go "freak show" unless it was a Vegas production. Cirque plays to the very wealthy adult/senior crowd, and I don't think a haunting and serious production would be popular amongst their target audience. Remember Criss Angel's Believe and oVo? Not very popular. At all.
Posted: 7/14/13 at 7:25pm
Posted: 7/14/13 at 7:29pm
Posted: 7/14/13 at 7:48pm
Posted: 1/14/14 at 4:21pm
Posted: 1/15/14 at 12:24pm
Cirque on Broadway would work, only because they have the money and knowhow to make incredibly complex rigs/lighting/sound/etc work. Their rigging is mostly owned by them, so they don't have the extreme rental cost issues that a show like Spiderman did. They have experience in creating extreme spectacle. The only issue would be in how far they're allowed to go in renovating a theater to handle their needs... This isn't Vegas and you can't just gut a historic structure.
BroadwayWorld TV