"Oasis, go buy yourself a clue.
At least the show I like wasn't critically panned and actually WON some Tonys. I think that gives me a little more of a leg to stand on than you.
AND I am a profound lover of the classics and of legendary performers like Elaine Stritch, who's performance brought me to tears.
I was merely saying that, due to muscle's tastes I don't think he would enjoy the DVD and was advising against wasting his money.
Next time, don't try to start a fight if you're not prepared. Because you'll lose. "
I don't need a leg to stand on here, nor am I looking to "win" anything. My comment was just to point out that I think your statement was rude and not something that is appropriate. But why the need to bring the word "fight" into it? It's rather sad actually, that my disagreement with you is seen (by you) as a "fight." That really hones in on your frame of mind. Interesting too, that you can criticize someone else's tastes, but someone else can not criticize yours. All because Spamalot won some Tonys. :inserteyerollhere: Because we all know that winning Tonys automatically makes it a good show.
There is really no need to act like your original comment was solely to do someone a favor. Perhaps you don't see that there is a difference between politely recommending that someone not buy something and rudely doing the same. :shrug:
PS you never answered my question when I asked "why the need to criticize?"
Updated On: 2/26/06 at 08:30 AM