I think Robbie and I are on the same page here. (Not always, but here.)
I have to say, as far as musical performers go (and I say this as a trained singer with a pretty damn decent voice), I have always been most impacted by the performers and performances who manage to blend the two (singing/acting) into one performance of a CHARACTER. Not an actress who sings or a singer who acts. But a character, living, breathing, and existing on stage in a believable (within the confines of musical theatre) story.
More often than not, as soon as a performer hits a "perfect note," as much as I appreciate it and can even be overwhelmed by it, it almost always takes me out of the moment, the character, the story, and the show.
It only seems to work if the singing voice perfectly fits the character. And that is so rare that a true, flawless SINGER is the right voice for a person on stage, even in a musical.
Rose shouldn't have talent. ("Not what I call REAL talent.") She wasn't good enough and didn't make it. If she opens her mouth and sings better than anybody else on stage, she's already lost me. The story and the character aren't quite believable.
EDIT:
Think about some of the legendary roles and performers on Broadway ...
Zero Mostel, Fiddler
Carol Channing, Dolly
Yul Brynner, Kind and I
Rex Harrison, My Fair Lady
Were any of them "wonderful singers?"
No. But they were perfect for the roles and history was made.
Someone like Streisand in Funny Girl? It's believable (even if it's not historically accurate) that Fanny could and would have an "incredible" voice ... however you define that. It works.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 8/8/12 at 05:34 PM