"Into the Woods" separatists thread
#52ITW
Posted: 12/19/14 at 12:22pm
Nope. Not til I saw that my simple request (along with others) resulted in this parody thread.
Been on here for many years and avoided going down bitchy snark-holes like this til now. A NYT/theater employee friend in NYC said "you still go on that site?" when we were visiting in Oct and I mentioned this board. Kinda seeing why now...
#56ITW
Posted: 12/19/14 at 12:48pm
tazber: LOL.. probably!
Not leaving... too entertaining to leave. Just confused by the unnecessary drama over wanting something as simple as a review thread when almost every show seems to get one. Didn't really "care" per se; just baffled by the hostile reaction. (And now by the epic, Mean Girls-level condescension from CarlosAlberto.)
#60ITW
Posted: 12/19/14 at 1:07pm
Jpbran complained in the other thread that there should be a separate review thread for ITW. Rather than do something, like...perhaps start a review thread for ITW, he complained more.
That is the behavior that gets humorous threads like these started.
Am I not seeing this clearly?
"In Oz, the verb is douchifizzation." PRS
Wildcard
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/21/06
#63ITW
Posted: 12/19/14 at 1:54pm
"I don't get why we need a review thread for a movie. Isn't that what Rotten Tomatoes is for?"
THAT is a great point, and something I hadn't thought of...
And I'll now say looking back at the other board, I thought other people were asking too and had been told it was a bad idea, so I didn't want to start a new thread and annoy people. But I guess it was just me and one or two others...Then I just got irritated when I saw this satire-titled thread (now changed to ITW) and the posts implying/saying people wanted threads for EVERYTHING regarding the movie. I fold and apologize.
And growl: I don't THINK I've been snarky or sarcastic too much here...I do need to stop throwing the word "gestapo"around. Gah.
(PS-- No matter how the above reads, it's sincere and NOT supposed to be bitchy)
Updated On: 12/19/14 at 01:54 PM
#64ITW
Posted: 12/19/14 at 3:52pm
Very cool response, jpbran.
"In Oz, the verb is douchifizzation." PRS
#65ITW
Posted: 12/19/14 at 5:03pm
Is this one of the most inept film reviews ever written this side of Rex Reed?
http://www.filmjournal.com/filmjournal/content_display/reviews/major-releases/e3i8684d8009f075896368fc1d018fef731
#70ITW
Posted: 12/19/14 at 10:39pmThis thread is very floral and fragrant.
#72ITW
Posted: 12/20/14 at 10:36am
Edelstein: Well, there’s the rub. I didn’t think the show fully earned its slap-in-the-face second act onstage, either, but in a Sondheim musical you don’t expect happily-ever-afters;
What is so hard to get about how the libretto earns its second act?
You have a second inciting incident: Jack went to another realm, stole and killed and now the surviving Giant is pissed, as anyone would be.
And you have ensuing complications: Jack's neighbors, in addition to their coping with their petty fulfillments not being as personally fulfilling as they seemed they might be while they were in a state of pre-fulfillment deprivation and longing, have to cope with collective accountability, their will to survive (those who still have one) and all the difficult choices real life brings.
#73ITW
Posted: 12/20/14 at 6:31pm
Another seriously inept review, courtesy of Compuserve. Yes, COMPUSERVE. Guess the PanAm in-flight magazine or the Betamax-Lover Weekly wasn't available. You can find the pull quote at RottenTomatoes.. Don't want to link here and increase their click count to the double digits.
Crazy run-on sentences, an oddly-scolding tone, and an almost child-like lack of basic story comprehension. Bizarre.
Videos










