First of all, speaking about getting your facts correct, it's NewYorkTheater -- er, not re.
Second, you sound very close to the white Southerners during the Civil Rights Movement who presented themselves as the voice of reason in the face of an "emotive subject" like civil rights. It's not they who were racists, they said, but neither were they "agitators."; they were trying to keep the racists and the "civil rights agitators" from turning the situation violent.
I reject completely your pathetic argument that because this theater company got funding from their country's MInistry of Culture that they deserved to be targeted by a mob who, everyone agrees, disrupted not just their show but the other shows in the area. How can you possibly justify such disruption as acceptable and civilized under any circumstances?
But if you got a grant from the U.S. National Endowment for the Arts, does this mean that protesters against the U.S. policy in, say, the Middle East, would have the right to shut down your show, and the other shows around you?
Updated On: 8/1/14 at 11:08 PM