The book of Jersey Boys is, I'm sorry- AMAZING. It's a wonderful, solid story and I was very disappointed that Brickman and Ellis didn't win. I haven't seen Chaperone yet, but I wonder if it makes you care half as much about the main characters as Jersey Boys does. Chaperone strikes me (again, only going on what I've seen/read) as a fun, high-energy show with a lot of jokes, but slim on character depth. Jersey Boys goes in to the lives of each of these men... probably more "character development" than I've seen in a show in quite some time... yet it's being strung up because it uses the music from the Four Seasons catalogue. It may not be what Rodgers and Hammerstein envisioned when they penned "Oklahoma", but I see it as a musical.
I would say that, ever since "Contact" won back in 2001, the definition of musical has been changing. I love traditional book-driven musicals with original scores, but they seem to be losing steam. Just because a show is completely new doesn't mean it should automatically deserve the big prize. Neither should a show deserve the big prize because of a big name (*cough* Spamalot *cough*). A successful night of theater for me is one in which I was both entertained and forced to think a little. I don't need to have a life-changing experience every time I go to the theater- I'll admit, I really enjoyed Spamalot- but the best theater touches you. And Jersey Boys did for me.
*~* Every time you double-post, God kills a kitten. *~*
Kay, the Thread-Jacking Jedi
Quando omni flunkus moritati (When all else fails, play dead...)
"... chasin' the music. Trying to get home."
Peter Gregus: "Where are my house right ladies?!"
(love you, girls! - 6/13/06)