I thought I covered pretty clearly what you're asking, so either you missed it or you simply don't believe me. For what it's worth, of course not; I'm not one of the people here arguing that this show is flawless. He makes some good points -- but good, bad or indifferent, I still think he's writing on a glorified blog. Hardly need to for such dramatic presentation on this thread.
I pre-emptively said, in the post you responded to, that I don't think we should only consider positive reviews, and that I agree with many of the negative points raised in this review, from the work needed and not being done on the writing to the strange switch in image and persona on Jonas, the latter being something not a lot of people have agreed with me on. (i.e. Raul looks hot, so that's all that matters, when, no, it's not, I don't care how good he looks, this image doesn't work.) I've said many, many times in various threads that I think (based on the workshops) this show could have been so much more than it appears to have amounted to. This writer's criticisms aren't to be dismissed, don't get me wrong there; I just thought humbug was making too big a deal of it; I didn't say "who cares?" -- I implied "calm down." Does that make sense? Hopefully it clarifies.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 10/14/10 at 11:40 PM