Miracle Worker Reviews

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 3:54pm

I guess the reviews may begin to trickle out soon...

Marie: Don't be in such a hurry about that pretty little chippy in Frisco. Tony: Eh, she's a no chip!

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 4:04pm

Not a review, but here is show footage from the website:

http://www.miracleworkeronbroadway.com/

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 4:32pm

Oh my gosh, I'm totally in that video.
Annnyyyway, break a leg to everyone involved tonight!

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 6:22pm

Where is LimelightMike?

"The price of love is loss, but still we pay; We love anyway."

Updated On: 3/3/10 at 06:22 PM

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 7:25pm

The Hollywood Reporter is mixed, calling it "credible," but has issues (surprise, surprise) with the staging.

Hollywood Reporter

Updated On: 3/3/10 at 07:25 PM

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 7:27pm

USA Today is also mixed, giving it 2.5 stars (out of 4), and calling it "dated," but gives praise to Pill and Breslin.
USA Today

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 7:28pm

Variety is positive (and stresses the play's kiddie appeal)

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117942344.html?categoryId=33&cs=1

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 7:31pm

Backstage is mixed to positive, with a rave for Pill and a solid notice for Breslin. However, the review cautions, "You should never stage "The Miracle Worker" in the round."
Backstage review

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 7:34pm

The Variety review is positive, with raves for Pill and Breslin.
Variety

#10

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 7:52pm

I really hope this play can last until the Tonys!

#11

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 8:05pm

Kuchwara's AP review is positive, with good notices for Pill and Breslin. However, he also takes issues with the staging and direction.
AP review

#12

The Chicago Tribune is mixed to negative. Nice reviews for Pill and Breslin, but he absolutely hated the supporting cast and calls staging the show in the round an "idea that mostly seems to cause everyone problems."

Chicago Tribune

Updated On: 3/3/10 at 08:13 PM

#13

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 9:52pm

Good old El Paso Inc. has leaked the NY Times review again, and it's a pan.

He respected Pill for being different from Bancroft, but thinks that, "an over-the-top ferocity may be necessary to camouflage the cliches of what Annie has to say." Doesn't like anything about the production, and has major issues with the in the round staging, saying, "The Circle in the Square is an in-the-round theater, a geometric fact that seems to have defeated the designers here."

Not good. This might be the nail in their coffin.

NY Times on Miracle Worker

Updated On: 3/3/10 at 09:52 PM

#14

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 10:09pm

As always, going totally against everyone else, good old Matthew Murray at Talkin' Broadway is a rave.
Talkin' Broadway review

#15

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 10:13pm

Has anyone else heard that a closing notice was posted for this pending the reviews (and results of them) ??

If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it? These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.

#16

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 10:18pm

I haven't seen this production, so I'm in no position to comment one way or the other. BUT, I never thought the idea of reviving it on Broadway was a good idea from the get-go. The value of the original production lay in the performances of Bancroft/Duke, both of which were captured well in the movie. Just a mis-guided effort, with no offense to all. I do object, however, to the criticism of the use of the Circle in the Square's playing space. Last year's production of The Norman Conquests proved that, when well-staged, any piece can be most effective. Just my thoughts.

BroadwayEd

#17

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 10:18pm

That rumor was on ATC.

#18

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 10:24pm

I do object, however, to the criticism of the use of the Circle in the Square's playing space. Last year's production of The Norman Conquests proved that, when well-staged, any piece can be most effective. Just my thoughts.

None of the reviews, or anyone on here, has any issues with the space itself, just how it is utilized for THIS production. The director didn't have any idea how to use the space. It's also possible that this is a play which fundamentally doesn't work in the round.

#19

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 10:54pm

I am in agreement with AdamGreer about the comments being about the UTILIZATION of the space, not the space itself.

Even though I hope to catch this (have tix for April) I am wary when you have to be warned against sitting in more than 1/2 the theater.

And thanks to Ljay for giving me the source of the rumor....I dont' visit there, but a highly accurate friend had mentioned it to me. Didn't ask where she heard it.

#20

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 11:21pm

Looks like my boy Brantley is giving it a pan:

http://theater.nytimes.com/2010/03/04/theater/reviews/04miracle.html?hpw

This is the death blow for the production.

(Adam: try NOT to repeat this post again, please!)

Updated On: 3/3/10 at 11:21 PM

#21

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 11:27pm

My bad Adam! I pulled a you and didn't read up! However, I do agree: without the New York Times attached, this play is gone.

HELLO SCOTTSBORO BOYS!!!

#22

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 11:34pm

As for the closing notice, as I understand it Actors' Equity requires producers to give their members at least a one week notice before they close a play. Therefore, closing notices are posted in advance of an opening just in case the reviews are terrible and they (the producers) decide to cut their losses quickly.

Cheyenne Jackson tickled me. AFTER ordering SoMMS a drink but NOT tickling him, and hanging out with Girly in his dressing room (where he DIDN'T tickle her) but BEFORE we got married. To others. And then he tweeted Boobs. He also tweeted he's good friends with some chick on "The Voice" who just happens to be good friends with Tink's ex. And I'm still married. Oh, and this just in: "Pettiness, spite, malice ....Such ugly emotions... So sad." - After Eight, talking about MEEEEEEEE!!! I'm so honored! :-)

Updated On: 3/3/10 at 11:34 PM

#23

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 11:36pm

Miss Worinskey just started her full time duties this week as Artistic Director of Intiman (replacing Bart Sher) this week. Seems to be bad timing.

I say close it. It doesn't seem to be ringing anyone's bells. Scottsboro Boys please!

And I've never seen that poster from ATC be wrong about any other rumors he's posted.

"Broadway...I'll lick you yet!"

#24

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 11:42pm

If this show shutters, Million Dollar Quartet really needs to move to this space. It's gonna flop at the Nederlander. I mean, it plays in a round in Chicago. It would work.

#25

Miracle Worker Reviews

Posted: 3/3/10 at 11:59pm

Would their running costs be low enough for it to make a profit in Circle in the Square? Besides, too late to change their minds now. And that director would be best not to return to Circle after his last disaster there.

"Broadway...I'll lick you yet!"

← Back to Message Board

View all Videos

Tickets From $59

Tickets From $71