Miracle Worker Reviews
Miracle Worker Reviews#1
Posted: 3/3/10 at 3:54pmI guess the reviews may begin to trickle out soon...
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/16/06
Miracle Worker Reviews#2
Posted: 3/3/10 at 4:04pm
Not a review, but here is show footage from the website:
http://www.miracleworkeronbroadway.com/
Miracle Worker Reviews#2
Posted: 3/3/10 at 4:32pm
Oh my gosh, I'm totally in that video.
Annnyyyway, break a leg to everyone involved tonight!
Miracle Worker Reviews#3
Posted: 3/3/10 at 6:22pm
Where is LimelightMike?
Miracle Worker Reviews#4
Posted: 3/3/10 at 7:25pm
The Hollywood Reporter is mixed, calling it "credible," but has issues (surprise, surprise) with the staging.
Hollywood Reporter
Updated On: 3/3/10 at 07:25 PM
Miracle Worker Reviews#5
Posted: 3/3/10 at 7:27pm
USA Today is also mixed, giving it 2.5 stars (out of 4), and calling it "dated," but gives praise to Pill and Breslin.
USA Today
Miracle Worker Reviews#6
Posted: 3/3/10 at 7:28pm
Variety is positive (and stresses the play's kiddie appeal)
http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117942344.html?categoryId=33&cs=1
Miracle Worker Reviews#7
Posted: 3/3/10 at 7:31pm
Backstage is mixed to positive, with a rave for Pill and a solid notice for Breslin. However, the review cautions, "You should never stage "The Miracle Worker" in the round."
Backstage review
Miracle Worker Reviews#8
Posted: 3/3/10 at 7:34pm
The Variety review is positive, with raves for Pill and Breslin.
Variety
Miracle Worker Reviews#10
Posted: 3/3/10 at 8:05pm
Kuchwara's AP review is positive, with good notices for Pill and Breslin. However, he also takes issues with the staging and direction.
AP review
Miracle Worker Reviews#11
Posted: 3/3/10 at 8:13pm
The Chicago Tribune is mixed to negative. Nice reviews for Pill and Breslin, but he absolutely hated the supporting cast and calls staging the show in the round an "idea that mostly seems to cause everyone problems."
Chicago Tribune
Updated On: 3/3/10 at 08:13 PM
Miracle Worker Reviews#12
Posted: 3/3/10 at 9:52pm
Good old El Paso Inc. has leaked the NY Times review again, and it's a pan.
He respected Pill for being different from Bancroft, but thinks that, "an over-the-top ferocity may be necessary to camouflage the cliches of what Annie has to say." Doesn't like anything about the production, and has major issues with the in the round staging, saying, "The Circle in the Square is an in-the-round theater, a geometric fact that seems to have defeated the designers here."
Not good. This might be the nail in their coffin.
NY Times on Miracle Worker
Updated On: 3/3/10 at 09:52 PM
Miracle Worker Reviews#13
Posted: 3/3/10 at 10:09pm
As always, going totally against everyone else, good old Matthew Murray at Talkin' Broadway is a rave.
Talkin' Broadway review
Miracle Worker Reviews#14
Posted: 3/3/10 at 10:13pm
Has anyone else heard that a closing notice was posted for this pending the reviews (and results of them) ??
Miracle Worker Reviews#15
Posted: 3/3/10 at 10:18pmI haven't seen this production, so I'm in no position to comment one way or the other. BUT, I never thought the idea of reviving it on Broadway was a good idea from the get-go. The value of the original production lay in the performances of Bancroft/Duke, both of which were captured well in the movie. Just a mis-guided effort, with no offense to all. I do object, however, to the criticism of the use of the Circle in the Square's playing space. Last year's production of The Norman Conquests proved that, when well-staged, any piece can be most effective. Just my thoughts.
Miracle Worker Reviews#17
Posted: 3/3/10 at 10:24pm
I do object, however, to the criticism of the use of the Circle in the Square's playing space. Last year's production of The Norman Conquests proved that, when well-staged, any piece can be most effective. Just my thoughts.
None of the reviews, or anyone on here, has any issues with the space itself, just how it is utilized for THIS production. The director didn't have any idea how to use the space. It's also possible that this is a play which fundamentally doesn't work in the round.
Miracle Worker Reviews#18
Posted: 3/3/10 at 10:54pm
I am in agreement with AdamGreer about the comments being about the UTILIZATION of the space, not the space itself.
Even though I hope to catch this (have tix for April) I am wary when you have to be warned against sitting in more than 1/2 the theater.
And thanks to Ljay for giving me the source of the rumor....I dont' visit there, but a highly accurate friend had mentioned it to me. Didn't ask where she heard it.
Miracle Worker Reviews#19
Posted: 3/3/10 at 11:21pm
Looks like my boy Brantley is giving it a pan:
http://theater.nytimes.com/2010/03/04/theater/reviews/04miracle.html?hpw
This is the death blow for the production.
(Adam: try NOT to repeat this post again, please!)
Updated On: 3/3/10 at 11:21 PM
Miracle Worker Reviews#20
Posted: 3/3/10 at 11:27pm
My bad Adam! I pulled a you and didn't read up! However, I do agree: without the New York Times attached, this play is gone.
HELLO SCOTTSBORO BOYS!!!
Miracle Worker Reviews#21
Posted: 3/3/10 at 11:34pm
As for the closing notice, as I understand it Actors' Equity requires producers to give their members at least a one week notice before they close a play. Therefore, closing notices are posted in advance of an opening just in case the reviews are terrible and they (the producers) decide to cut their losses quickly.
Miracle Worker Reviews#22
Posted: 3/3/10 at 11:36pm
Miss Worinskey just started her full time duties this week as Artistic Director of Intiman (replacing Bart Sher) this week. Seems to be bad timing.
I say close it. It doesn't seem to be ringing anyone's bells. Scottsboro Boys please!
And I've never seen that poster from ATC be wrong about any other rumors he's posted.
Joined: 12/31/69
Miracle Worker Reviews#23
Posted: 3/3/10 at 11:42pmIf this show shutters, Million Dollar Quartet really needs to move to this space. It's gonna flop at the Nederlander. I mean, it plays in a round in Chicago. It would work.
Miracle Worker Reviews#24
Posted: 3/3/10 at 11:59pmWould their running costs be low enough for it to make a profit in Circle in the Square? Besides, too late to change their minds now. And that director would be best not to return to Circle after his last disaster there.
Videos

.jpg?format=auto&width=200)





