JBradshaw said: "I’ve only seen mame once. Andrea McArdle was Mame and Lea Delaria was Vera.
one of the worst shows I’ve ever seen made me eh re mame. Is it a good show with the right people?"
Response to last 2 posts:
Re ‘is it good’, I can only tell you that Mame with Angela Lansbury still rates as my favorite single night in the theatre in 58 years. Great leading role plus three additional excellent roles (young Patrick won a Tony), old fashioned brassy overture (IMO up there with the best, just below Gypsy), very enjoyable score, opportunities for great choreography, very funny, emotionally engaging. It didn’t think it was slow for a second, re a previous response. Would have run a lot longer if the producer was David Merrick: the immediate two replacements for Mame were both mediocre. I am not saying it is the greatest musical, but with the right director and choreographer, the right Mae and Vera, I believe it could be a hit.
Re Baranski, the only area in which we excelled was at n wearing the costumes. She can sing more than satisfactorily (she was IMO excellent as Mrs. Lovett I the Kennedy Center Sweeney Tood), but she couldn’t project the warmth that was needed, her dancing was mediocre (and Mame, at least in the original production dances a lot) and she just seemed too old for the role to me. I was very relieved when they elected not to bring it to NYC because I knew it would flop (Harriet Harris was a terrible Vera as well). Even the sets were ugly.