It's funny how people rewrite and interpret history to fit their victim agendas. Nancy Reagan referred the Rock Hudson matter to the US Embassy in Paris. It is very possible she thought that they would be better able to handle the matter. There was also, at the time, a documented by the press call from her to the French President on the matter. Plus, if the press got word that the Reagans were giving special treatment to their friends that regular people couldn't get, they'd have been (rightly) up in arms. Also, it is very possible that she didn't understand how dire his situation was at the time. And in the end Hudson did get to see that doctor and receive that treatment, but he was too far gone. I never bought the "Reagan ignored AIDS narrative". Research was well funded from 1982 on, in each budget Reagan signed, in ever increasing amounts. As for healthcare, it wasn't the issue then that it is now. Most people were covered and treated. Reagan was FAR from perfect on AIDS, but his legacy is much more complex that most on either side are willing to admit. Just remember, he was instrumental in defeating the Briggs Amendment in 1978, which would have banned gay teachers in California public schools. YES, it damn near passed, until he (likely at the urging of NANCY), came out publicly against it.
The fact that Reagan didn't do a major speech on AIDS is shameful, and a stain on his legacy. However, he did come around, and recorded an AIDS PSA in 1993, in which he did a sort of mea culpa. People either want to demonize Reagan, or make him into this perfect hero. Neither is true, as is often the case. The truth is more complex and nuanced.
That's my two cents.
Updated On: 3/7/16 at 07:06 PM