New Sister Act Broadway artwork

[jamiekennywicked]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 1:50pm

Thoughts?

[labwyfan]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 1:58pm

Love it! So much better than the graffiti look.

[AvenueQResident]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 2:04pm

Second one looks better with the logo blending in with the cast and scenery.

[D2]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 2:44pm

Ahh, Photoshop. Pounding another nail into the coffin of good design and typography.

[binau]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 3:37pm

The second one certainly addresses one of the reasons the first logo was claimed to fail by Michael Riedel - that people didn't know the show was a spectacle etc..

I like it. It makes the show look so much fun.

Updated On: 10/20/11 at 03:37 PM

[aasjb4ever]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 3:50pm

No comment...

[broadway_show_fan]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 3:57pm

the cast looks so pale that they remind me of the Voca People.

[RippedMan]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 5:47pm

My guess is that originally they thought Sister Act would be a star vehicle for Patina Miller, but when she lots out to Sutton they had to revamp the logo because no one really knows who Patina is.

[CATSNYrevival]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 7:14pm

I don't really like the font that they chose, but I like the rest of it. The font is just very simple, but I'm guessing they were looking for something closer to the movie logo.

[ljay889]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 7:16pm

Looks really cheap to me.

[bwayfan7000]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 7:27pm

I think I like it...but I'm not sure. I should love the second one, but the picture looks too...candid? I don't really know how to describe what I think of it, but it's not awful. I would just like them to make artwork that makes the show sell, because the show I like, no matter how I feel about the artwork.

[Bettyboy72]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 8:09pm

A great example of polishing a turd. Why spend the $$$ on new logos when the show will be gone in 3 months? What a waste.

[binau]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 8:46pm

Lol sad. But why should the producers, who will lose millions if this closes shortly, give up?

[adamgreer]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 8:54pm

I think it's a vast improvement over the last logo.

I like it.

[bwayphreak234]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 9:28pm

I love it!!!

[hyperbole_and_a_half]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 9:41pm

I don't know if it's the 3D or the shiny or what, but there is something nauseating about the kerning in the new logo :S

[Bettyboy72]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 9:53pm

To me. it's overstimulating. But then again, so is the musical. Like the previous comment, it definitely gives me a headache.

[bwaylyric]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 9:57pm

What happened to the letter "C"?

[aasjb4ever]

Posted: 10/20/11 at 10:03pm

Is the show anti-C-word?

[Sean2]

Posted: 10/21/11 at 11:48am

The font looks the same as used in the poster for the film, as well as the same placement. Maybe they're trying to get people to recognize/remember it immediately.

[husk_charmer]

Posted: 10/21/11 at 12:50pm

Hyperbole_and_a_half-
Agreed. I think the kerning is so weird because of the 3D...I particularly hate it on the 'ER' and 'CT.'

[tazber]

Posted: 10/21/11 at 2:34pm

Fail.

[tellybox]

Posted: 10/21/11 at 9:01pm

And I still haven't seen it!

[Unknown User]

Posted: 10/21/11 at 9:08pm

It's alright but is Gloriously Broadway their slogan? I get the thought behind it but I don't like it...

[philly03]

Posted: 10/21/11 at 9:13pm

I always liked the "original" logo from a few years ago, I'm sure they have different companies but I wonder why they didn't go back to the concept of this.