I'm a staunch believer that ageism must be fought aggressively. Yet not every story benefits from expanding upward the age of its protagonist(s). The tragedy of Norma Desmond is how quickly she was forgotten and relegated to a Miss Havisham niche in Hollywood. It's startling because 50 isn't geriatric; Norma is put out to pasture while still viable as actor and woman. Therein lies the messaging underneath the black satire - the short shelf life of women - that Scherzinger's Norma captured. You can disagree with everything Lloyd seized and still accept his production's thesis: the entertainment industry is so youth obsessed, it discards women before they've even moved out of the culturally approved self-presentation (I keep thinking of Anne Bancroft's Mrs. Robinson; she played it at 36; even if she appeared 42, let that sink in.). Lloyd made the case that Norma's sexual allure was intact but the industry's preferences negated it.
If Norma is in fact geriatric, it's not about a woman treated like Havisham; it's about a Havisham. That's not glib, but it's why a 78-year-old doesn't make the same persuasive case. Close's Norma would've been away from the business for nearly half a century. That Norma's belief that she should play Salome moves her into a different realm of self-delusion. Close can suggest 65; she cannot suggest 50. And that's about the storytelling, not ageism.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 8/14/25 at 08:30 AM