No more Tony Medallions?- Page 2
No more Tony Medallions?
#25No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 10:36amtazber-of course it is. But it gets your attention, and hopefully gets you to focus on the wrongness of the current system of purchased ego gratification.
#26No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 11:10am
hopefully gets you to focus
No. Your hope is misplaced. It just makes you sound like someone who uses wildly inaccurate analogies.
#27No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 12:12pmWithout backers there are no shows and therefore no Awards. Let them buy the statuette because without them there is no show.
Wilmingtom
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/18/11
#28No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 1:39pmThis has been going on forever. The truth is that Tony Award Productions needs the cash the sales bring in which is why they're still selling them. And on a side note, there is a difference between a producer and an investor.
#29No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 1:56pm
Wilmington re your side note--yes there is. The entire issue here is a result of labeling the latter as the former.
re the cash need-first of all, at RCMH, that's not really true. secondly, money is a lousy reason to do something that diminishes your brand. Finally, if they really need more money, the amount these trophies bring in could easily be raised from a further assessment across the board. In the scheme of things, it is not a lot of money.
#30No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 2:03pm
money is a lousy reason to do something that diminishes your brand
Again, which this does not do.
If only 2 of the 28 producers of A GENTLEMAN'S GUIDE TO LOVE AND MURDER are given medallions and the other 26 are allowed to purchase a medallion for $2500, Audra McDonald's Tonys are in no way diminished.
I repeat (because I'm sure you will continue to go on repeating the word "diminish"), Audra McDonald's Tonys are in no way diminished.
Audra McDonald's Tonys are in no way diminished.
Not one of Audra McDonald's Tonys would be harmed in the engraving of those 26 medallions.
Not ONE.
Wilmingtom
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/18/11
#32No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 3:44pmThat can be your opinion, PalJoey, but it is not mine, nor is it that of the owners of the brand.
Wilmingtom
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/18/11
#33No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 3:46pmMy response was to HogansHero. PJ beat me to the "post."
#34No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 4:12pm
I also believe that your endlessly referring to it as a "brand" diminishes the history and integrity of Tonys as an artistic award.
#35No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 5:04pmPayJoey-fine. feel free to substitute "award" for "brand." The bottom line is, when you own something, you get to decide what is good for it and what is bad for it. The Wing is the steward of the award, just as a writer's literary representative is the steward of one's work, and can decide that having too many productions of a play diminishes the property, even if you desperately want to see a revival of it.
#36No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 5:15pmBut when you say "diminishes the property," aren't you really saying "the commercial value of the property"?
#37No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 5:18pmI'm also unclear how this dilutes the integrity of the award. As it stands in the Tony winner archives- ALL producers are listed as nominees/winners for a production. They're already being formally acknowledged. Why not give them the award they're apparently winning if they are willing to pay for it?
#38No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 5:42pm
Reg-as it relates to playwrights, yes that's often (but not always) the reason.
Kad-you make a good point. My guess is that the same folks pushing the trophy issue will be back next with a restriction on who is listed and, even more, who is allowed on stage. There are a number of people vocally opposed to the embarrassing spectacle that we see often now especially on musicals. The bottom line is that you ought not to be able to buy a Tony, any more than you ought to be able to buy any award. Yet right now, if you have enough money, you can definitely buy one.
#39No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 5:54pmThe value that is diminished is the value of the physical pieces, not (as PalJoey has already said a hundred times) the value of the actual award itself. I don't think they are even claiming that the extra statues are diminishing the value of the award, only the physical statues. But why does the value of the physical statue matter? Whether Audra's statues cost $5 each or $1000 each, it doesn't change the recognition and value of the award.
#40No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 6:08pmqolbinau-no, they are talking about the integrity (and hence the value in non-monetary terms) of the award. As you say, the value of the physical statue doesn't mean anything. Why would the Wing care about the value of the physical thing? From that standpoint, they require non-transfer covenants anyway, so from their perspective and by their design there is no cash value .
#41No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 6:15pm
But this has been going on for a long time and thus far the prestige and value of the Tony remains intact.
#42No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 7:19pm
Tazber is right and PJ is right. To be honest, until they brought it up no one even really knew this was happening, so who cares? It diminishes nothing.
The Tonys value has been denigrated by the world of entertainment and media expanding to the point where many people dont even know what a Tony is. The Wing should work on creating more visibility and not about diluting a 'brand" that loses visibility and impact with each passing year.
Without producers, these musicals would be playing in the creative teams basement. I, for one, know that the touring houses, who often invest heavily in shows they believe will do well on the road are very proud of their medallions and how they can contribute to the magic of Broadway from a smaller city. There is nothing inauthentic about it. Actually, it EMBODIES the spirit of the Tonys.
As usual, the Wing are out of touch. A day late and a dollar short.
#43No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 7:22pmI think the Wing has a longer perspective on it.
#44No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 7:28pm
"Yet right now, if you have enough money, you can definitely buy one."
Well, no. Right now, if you have enough money, you can buy the trophy that represents the award you already won. Or am I really misunderstanding?
dramamama611
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/4/07
#45No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 8:50pm
And no....it's not about having the money to buy one. You or I cannot simply buy one. We have to be already affiliated with and recognized by the Tony committee as a producer.
If my $$ is good enough to accept to get the show running, and that show goes on to win one of the big four, why SHOULDN'T I be able to pay for the priviledge of have the momento of the occasion?
If they want to officially make the distinction between investor and producer, I have no problem with that either.
#46No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 10:01pm
Reg-You may not have misunderstood; I wasn't that clear. If you have enough money to invest in enough shows, one will win. So without too much effort, one can indeed buy the fireplace bling, and they do. (Incidentally, it's also a decent investment strategy to invest in most shows across the board. If you leave out the obvious dogs, when you do the math, you'll see that you end up with a positive result because the downside risk is limited and the upside reward is not.)
Drama-as I explained above, if you have the funds, you can always back the winner. As to why you shouldn't be able to... in what other investment do you get a momento in such circumstances? If you invest in a building that wins the Pritzker, you do not share in it. If you invest in a hockey team, you don't get to take the Stanley Cup home. But if you have no problem with a distinction, then you should have no problem with what the wing is contemplating.
dramamama611
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/4/07
#47No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 10:38pm
There IS only one Stanley Cup....so that analagy makes no sense. ONE, and it moves to the current winner. There ARE multiple Tony Awards every year.
BTW....I never said I had a problem with what they are considering. I just can see both sides of the "concern". Personally, its their argument that I don't get....that it somehow devalues the award.
#48No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 11:01pm
Drama-do you really think it does not diminish an award when it is given to people who didn't work on the show? (It's your right to feel that way; I just don't get it.)
In kindergarten, everyone gets a prize just for participating. As we grow up, we only get prizes for merit. A Tony sitting on the mantle of someone in Greenwich is bling, not an award. It's what you get for over the fireplace in the library. For the garage, you get a Lamborghini.
#49No more Tony Medallions?
Posted: 5/15/14 at 11:13pm
I might be able to agree with you if the committee issued some guidelines about who's a producer and who's not--that is, what, specifically, you have to do to be considered a "real" producer. But I don't think that's how the business is set up at present.
I'm probably showing my ignorance here, but I'm not sure I understand how even the realest of producers equates with the director, set designer, etc., in terms of creative input.
Videos