Oliver!: Good show or bad show?

[EganFan2]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 6:53pm

What is the general feeling about the musical "Oliver!"? I know some people dislike that the "dark" aspects were taken out, but IMO there is still some darkness to it. (Nancy and Sykes, anyone?). And I know that it would be neigh impossible to put the entire novel onstage, but the book (script) was sketchy at best, unless that's by design. I don't know the production history. That's the only thing I didn't care for. It's a wonderful score.

BTW, I read somewhere once that Julie Andrews was considered for Nancy in the movie. Was that true?

[AC126748]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 6:55pm

Personally, I love it and would kill for a revival.

[EdmundOG]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 6:58pm

Bad. Oliver is the title character, and his first line of substance is like a half hour in. And he doesn't DO anything. I know that's not his fault, he's a Dickens character, but that doesn't work onstage.

[alterego]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 10:07pm

Compared to what? I'd say very good show, though I've always wondered why Oliver always speaks with such an uppercrust accent when he's spent his entire life in the workhouse. Updated On: 5/23/07 at 10:07 PM

[Mr Roxy]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 10:08pm

Having seen the original with Georgia Brown, I agree this needs a revival ASAP.

Great show, great show & a shame it has not been revived by now.

[ThankstoPhantom]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 10:11pm

It's good...but not great. Nancy's story is more of the highlight for me...it breaks my heart.

[AnnaK<3LMIP]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 10:20pm

I love the novel..
but I hate the music in the musical...

They are Dickens characters and I love Dickens characters, but musically it's not a good show at all, I think.

[EganFan2]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 10:22pm

"compared to what?"

Just in general. You know (personally) if a show is good or not when you watch it.

[CurtainPullDowner]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 10:23pm

The original was quite a winner, the design was first rate.
I believe it is a very good show.

[wickedfan]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 10:25pm

"I love the novel..
but I hate the music in the musical..."

Really? For me, the score is the only redeeming quality of the show. I've stated before I think it's an overlong show with too many songs (does Bill Sykes really need a 2 and a half minute number about how people are afraid of him?), but many good ones nonetheless. The movie's wonderful, I feel, and a complete improvement of the show. If they ever do a revival of Oliver! I hope they find some middleground between the two. Characters were more developed, story lines actually had a beginning middle and an end, and many of the unneeded songs were cut.

[neddyfrank2]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 11:16pm

Good Show!

[misschung]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 11:22pm

For me, the score is the only redeeming quality of the show. I've stated before I think it's an overlong show with too many songs

I agree - I think if the right person did a revival, it could be really good tho

[songanddanceman2]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 11:26pm

This show is massive here in the UK (kind a like Blood Brothers big with equally bad revivals and tours) and i have never understood why(blood brothers to)

[wickedfan]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 11:29pm

I don't understand Blood Brothers appeal. It has three good melodies. That are repeated over, and over, and over, and over. I can't think of Marilyn Monroe now without remembering "He treats his ills/With daily pills/Just like Marilyn Monroe/His mind's gone dancing/It's gone dancing..." Ugh, horrible show.

[songanddanceman2]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 11:31pm

hahaha tell me about it, i never liked it but everyone else over here in the UK loves it (just celebrated 20 years)

[JohnBoy2]

Posted: 5/22/07 at 11:51pm

Great show!! Seeing the original Broadway production was a thrill, and it needs to be revived.

[munkustrap178]

Posted: 5/23/07 at 12:23am

GREAT show. GREAT GREAT GREAT!

But a BRILLIANT film.

[Justin D]

Posted: 5/23/07 at 8:41am

i saw the london revival one (c.1996) and was impressed, i thought it was rather dark in places, and the set was amazing.

[Dancin Thru Life]

Posted: 5/23/07 at 9:08am

After playing Dodger for over 50 performances when I was a kid, I can honestly say I HATE HATE HATE this show! HAHA!
I still think it is too dark, slow-moving, and generally boring to watch on stage.
Aside from the musical numbers "Food Glorious Food" and "Consider Yourself" - which both occur fairly early in the show, I could not stand most of the rest of the score. It was slow and tedious until "Oom Pah Pah" at the start of Act 2, most of which is filled with Reprises!
The First Act of the show featuring THE BOYS is FAR more tolerable than the adult drama of Act 2!

The movie, however has a better pace, but is still very dark and slow moving. It did win 6 Major Academy Awards though, compared to only 3 Minor Tonys for the stage production.

To each his own, eh?

Updated On: 5/23/07 at 09:08 AM

[munkustrap178]

Posted: 5/23/07 at 9:10am

Why do people equate dark with bad?

It's realistic.

[Dancin Thru Life]

Posted: 5/23/07 at 9:17am

DARK = lack of proper LIGHTING in my post....not referencing a GLOOMY or DISMAL mood! Sorry if that wasn't clear.

I've never seen a production where you could actually see the characters or scenery because of over-eager lighting designers to showcase their "mood lighting" skills.
I prefer a much better lit show I guess.

[alterego]

Posted: 5/23/07 at 10:45am

The 1996 revival ( Cam Mac) was hopelessly overproduced and lacked focus.

[songanddanceman2]

Posted: 5/23/07 at 10:47am

The 96 revival was a mess(overblown) and the touring production of it around the UK was even worse

[doodlenyc]

Posted: 5/23/07 at 10:54am

This was already revived on Broadway in 1984 with Patti Lupone and Ron Moody (the film's Fagin). It flopped. Even Patti got bad reviews.
That's not to say a good production couldnt sell to today's audiences.

I adore the show, the film, and I think it's a great score.

[robbiej]

Posted: 5/23/07 at 10:57am

Great show...and even better film.

Shani Wallis is marvelous.