Phantom to Close On Broadway
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#25
Posted: 7/16/08 at 9:51pm
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway
Posted On: 7/16/08 at 09:20:13 PM
Again, it is a JOKE!!! No need to get your panties in a twist!!
wicked_beast4,
We ALL understood what you meant the first time. No point in...
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#26
Posted: 7/16/08 at 9:53pmOMG - bryan/theatre2 made a post NOT RELATED TO CAST RECORDINGS OF FLOPS!
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#27
Posted: 7/16/08 at 9:53pm
Aww, but BFB, beating it is half the fun!!!!!!!! Haha, I am very hypocritical.
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#28
Posted: 7/16/08 at 9:53pmPhew. Some of you people must be a real mess on April Fool's Day. Don't you have any sense of humor at all? Sure the title was meant to get a rise out of people. It sure as hell worked, didn't it? Why get so emotionally distraught over it because you were "caught" by it?
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#29
Posted: 7/16/08 at 9:56pm
I'm sending wicked_beast4 a big ol' basket of kisses.
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#32
Posted: 7/16/08 at 11:28pm
As i've said before- stupid little kids who know nothing about the theatre! Ban all under 18s cos they know nothing!
Someone change Betsy Wetsy's diaper
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#33
Posted: 7/16/08 at 11:36pmYou mean Pappy's Crappie Nappie.
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#34
Posted: 7/16/08 at 11:54pmWill Cammack call it a "revival" when it reopens? *eye roll*
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#35
Posted: 7/17/08 at 1:16am
My Oh My, if your making a comment about how you don't consider Les Miserables to have had a revival your wrong. There is no rule that says that a revival has to be a re imangied version of the show in any way. Sure some of them are. Technically all a a show has to have in order to be considered a revival is a period of 3 or more years between the revival production and the original. Les Miserables had 3 years and only 3 years so by technical standings it was a revival.
I remember reading in the West End forum when this was going on in London that there were tourists who had thought that the show was closing forever in London. As if their eyes stopped reading the article after the words "Phantom Closing" and didn't see the part were it was for 4 days to re do the sound system and thus tickets sold like hotcakes. I wonder if the same thing would happen on Broadway. That tourists would hear that it is closing think it is forever and tickets would go like mad.
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#36
Posted: 7/17/08 at 2:58am
haha... when I saw this thread I went "it's about time..." ;P
not that there's anything wrong with Phantom (well, I mean, I'm not a fan... but I don't want to start anything, haha) ... there's just something wrong with it running for... what is it now, 20 years? o_o
[believe]
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#37
Posted: 7/17/08 at 10:34amLes Mis wasn't a revival? Since when? Isn't a revival by definition something that you bring back? I agree with winston. If it was to be considered a special engagement, wouldn't the run have been MUCH shorter?
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#38
Posted: 7/17/08 at 10:43amTo actually answer the OP's question. RENT closed for a week a few years ago to redo the sound system at the Nederlander. So this isn't precedent-setting.
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#38
Posted: 7/17/08 at 12:15pmI loved the title for the thread. It does catch your attention.
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#39
Posted: 7/17/08 at 12:20pm
Millie,
As far as My oh my is concerned I think that he/she feels like Les Miserables didn't have a revival becuase it was the same production that played on Broadway only three years prior.
But, I do remember Rent closing to make room for a new sound system.
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#40
Posted: 7/17/08 at 2:34pm
"As far as My oh my is concerned I think that he/she feels like Les Miserables didn't have a revival becuase it was the same production that played on Broadway only three years prior."
Furthermore, it closed, then opened a few years later. Chorus Line did the same thing, except the time gap between their closing and revial opening was much longer. And it wasn't completely new and reworked.
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#41
Posted: 7/18/08 at 1:45am
Winston, you're absolutely wrong. Of course Les Mis had an actual revival. To assume I meant I don't believe it did based on sets, is quite silly.
I recall when me and other Les Mis fans first heard of it, we were under the impression that it was only an extended tour stop of the 3rd national tour. And when they officially starting calling it a revival, I felt it was a marketing ploy. Along with the lure of revamped orchestrations, I thought it was just another one of Cammacks little tricks to stir curiosity and get more people to buy tix.
Of course today I acknowledge it as a revival by definition, but at the time, it was almost too incredible to believe they'd bring the show back so quickly and, like I mentioned before, I was almost certain it was an extended tour stop...hence the joke about Phantom being billed as a revival after the 4 day closure by the business savvy Mackintosh.
Anyway, ahhh, I'm late. Gotta go catch a plane!
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#42
Posted: 7/19/08 at 1:01am
Ooph, what an emotional roller coaster ride on my young heart. YAY! no.
YOU GOT ME! I've always wanted to be punked.
re: Phantom to Close On Broadway#43
Posted: 7/19/08 at 1:14am
My Oh My,
The thing is is that the revival was never announced as an exteded tour stop. The only articles that had anything to do with the tour and the revival were ones that had said that they were closing the tour to bring all the sets to NY. Not that the production at the Broadhurst was part of the tour.
Videos








