"However seeing as how the fan base hasn't helped the previous incarnations of a musical, I don't see how you can be so certain that they'll come out for this attempt."
As I've said, Jane Austen is becoming more and more mainstream, and it is a lucrative business for publishing and movies. I won't be surprising anyone with my thoughts when I say that audiences are receptive to different types of stories at different points in history.
"The difference is that from what little I've seen about this musical is that it's attempting to be period-based, NOT a modern interpretation.There's a huge difference in the style and are not remotely comparable when it comes to determining success."
Well... Spring Awakening is period based. Who knows- maybe Elizabeth will pull out a microphone from her Regency style dress, and Darcy will break into a rap all alone in the sitting room. I may be exaggerating, but this show doesn't have to be a repeat of Jane Eyre or Little Women. I believe that these show are beautiful shows with a place in musical theatre, but they are not monetarily lucrative at this point in history. What I'm hoping for is a fresh, but faithful, take on the story with wonderful music and lyrics.
"Positive reviews doesn't necessarily mean it will be well-received by the ticket-buying public, or all of the fans."
Reviews seem to have more influence on the Broadway box office than that of movies or even books.
Orange Skittles, I've been on this board long enough to know not to waste breath on defending my point. Especially when it has to do with a show that is not fully developed.
So, that was the Drowsy Chaperone. Oh, I love it so much. I know it's not a perfect show...but it does what a musical is supposed to do. It takes you to another world, and it gives you a little tune to carry with you in your head for when you're feeling blue. Ya know?
Updated On: 6/15/07 at 11:42 PM