I assume this was determined because Tick's journey drives the show. They go to Alice Springs because of Tick. The show starts with Tick and essentially ends with Tick's reunion with his son. It makes sense that they would consider Tick the main character and give him the last bow.
(Personally, I wish that instead of giving the three leads separate bows, they just had one group bow with all three of them together. I think that would solve a lot. But then, I'm all for group bows in general.)
I think what makes the bow order seem strange as it stands now is that compared to the others, Tick is an extremely passive character throughout most of the show. Things happen to and around him, but other than getting the three together on this road trip, he doesn't really DO much. On top of that, most of the time he stands back while his more colorful friends take center stage and have all the fun.
I think the production team has had issues with the development of this character in the past, because I remember reading that they felt that something wasn't working, which was why they made changes to the show prior to the move to Toronto, introducing Tick's son at the start of the show and bringing him back periodically throughout to kind of remind the audience of the primary reason for Tick's journey. I honestly cannot remember WHERE I read that, but if I find it I'll make sure to link back.
All that said, I absolutely do not feel that Will Swenson is miscast, that he doesn't care, that it seems like he's in a different show, or that he is too uncomfortable with the material. I've seen the show three times now (once in Toronto, twice in NY) and every time I leave so confused by the issues that people are having with Swenson. I think he's pretty perfect in the role. I'm seeing a layered and heartfelt performance from him every time. I didn't see the show in London or Australia, but having recently rewatched it, his portrayal seems consistent to me with Hugo Weaving's in the film. The only discomfort I've seen onstage is the discomfort of a character confused and conflicted about a reunion with a son he barely knows and a secret he's kept from his friends.
It has me wondering if some of the issues people are having are actually with the conflicted and passive nature of the character and not with the actor, in which case different casting might not have made a difference.
Updated On: 3/7/11 at 07:15 PM