I generally read the reviews as soon as they come out. Unless something is pretty much panned, I generally don't base a purchase on the reviews, for several reasons:
I have not infrequently disliked / been disappointed by shows that have gotten raves or, at least, very good reviews, e.g., hated CATS, City of Angels and Fun Home, disappointed by the original productions of Billy Elliott, A Chorus Line (which I saw at least three times in its first year, because of visitors wanting to see it) and Annie; and a decent number of classic musical revivals', e.g., last Kiss Me Kate revival.
I have thoroughly enjoyed a number of musicals which were not well reviewed or even panned. I have seen Finding Neverland 5 times, Cambridge, Broadway, and on tour, have recognized glaring deficiencies in each production, and have still loved them overall. Fifty years ago, I also loved Dear World, which I also knew had some serious flaws. The flaws, which resulted in the show receiving some real pans, did not keep me from loving parts of the show, as well as Angela Lansbury's performance...and etc.
There are some shows that have been critically acclaimed and huge hits that I have had no interest in seeing, sometimes based on the rave reviews. Passion is a musical that I never had any interest in seeing, based the story itself. I never liked the score to Rent, so I managed avoid it for more than a decade...and etc.
Bottom line: does the story sound interesting, have you liked previous works by the composer, director, et al, do you like the performers, do you want to see the work of new, unproven talents. If the answer to any of those questions is yes, go for it.
Updated On: 2/28/19 at 05:18 PM