Revival Recordings Better than the Original

[Scarywarhol]

Revival Recordings Better than the Original#1

Posted: 1/5/08 at 8:58pm

If this has been a topic before, it hasn't been for a long time. I was just discussing it with a friend of mine.

What revival recordings do you prefer to the original?

An unpopular opinion, I prefer the 2005 Sweeney recording to the original. An even more unpopular opinion, I think the 2002 Man of La Mancha cast album blows away the Richard Kiley version.

[BobbyBubby]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#2

Posted: 1/5/08 at 9:02pm

42nd Street
Sunday in the Park with George (London Revival)
My Fair Lady (with Christine Andreas)
Follies at Papermill (Only for quality and completeness)

[bjh2114]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#2

Posted: 1/5/08 at 9:04pm

Wonderful Town (Donna Murphy version)

[sally1112]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#3

Posted: 1/5/08 at 9:07pm

I like the Sweeney Todd revival with Patti, because this is the one I saw. But before everyone screams- I love, love, love the OBC too, I just like the revival better.

[LuPonatic]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#4

Posted: 1/5/08 at 9:09pm

Into the Woods Broadway Revival
Grease 1994 Revival
You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown

and I agree about the Sweeney Revival (if only the keys weren't changed!) Although I'm starting to wish they made a recording with Dorothy Loudon!

[Elphabatize]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#5

Posted: 1/5/08 at 9:13pm

LuPonatic, I agree that the revival of YAGMCB is better than the original but I'm going to have to disagree: nothing, and I mean nothing can beat Bernadette Peters, Chip Zien, Joanna Lock, and just the entire original cast of ITW.

[Sondheim_Geek]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#6

Posted: 1/5/08 at 9:21pm

Anything Goes
Assassins
Company
Sweeney Todd
Updated On: 1/5/08 at 09:21 PM

[Broadway_Bound_Star]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#7

Posted: 1/5/08 at 9:22pm

I would have to say:
A Chorus Line
Sweeney
and Assassins

[LostLeander]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#9

Posted: 1/5/08 at 9:29pm

I don't think there's any Sondheim revival recording that's superior to the original, in my mind. Perhaps because casting for original Sondheim shows was always perfect.

This isn't a revival, per se, but I do prefer the Williams/Stokes/McGillin Spider Woman.

Personally, I think I have too much bloom.

[Baiseur82]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#10

Posted: 1/5/08 at 9:42pm

I would agree that the 05 revival of Sweeney is better than the OBC.

"I'd rater be nine peoples favorite thing, than a hundred peoples ninth favorite thing"

[icantbelive]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#11

Posted: 1/5/08 at 10:23pm

Sweeney
Assassins
ACL
YAGMCB

[Brick]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#12

Posted: 1/5/08 at 10:49pm

hmmm.... I'll interpret "better" as which recording I prefer. I suppose everyone is doing likewise, but I wanted to preface since I certainly recognize I could not defend my position on most of these. They are just preferences.

Assassins
Annie Get Your Gun Reba Promo (even as a promo, it's the best)
Sweeney Todd 2005
London Chicago 1998
Kiss Me, Kate
Nine
London She Loves Me

[BNN]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#13

Posted: 1/5/08 at 10:53pm

I like the completeness of the revival of A Chorus Line and the Papermill Follies but the performances and orchestrations on the originals far surpass the revivals.

Tick Tock

[ljay889]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#14

Posted: 1/5/08 at 10:55pm

I can't believe how many people are listing Sweeney!

Sweeney's OBCR is far more complete than the revival recording, and it features the superior bombastic Tunick orchestrations.

[walkedthroughmany]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#15

Posted: 1/5/08 at 10:59pm

I slightly prefer the revival of "Little Shop of Horrors."

[jaystarr]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#16

Posted: 1/5/08 at 11:12pm

Company 2006 Revival bec. I enjoyed it tremendously.

and Pacific Overtures 2004 Revival...

J*
Updated On: 1/5/08 at 11:12 PM

[jv92]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#17

Posted: 1/5/08 at 11:36pm

It's rare when a revival album surpases an OBCR but there are a few special cases.

The Encores! recording of Pal Joey is not only more complete, but better than the 1950 Studio Cast Album and the 1952 Revival Cast Album, in my opinion.
Despite the fact that the original cast was superior in many ways to the Papermill revival cast, that recording of Follies surpases the OBCR. I'd gladly listen to the OBCR any day, but the Papermill album is far more complete. We can hear those extra verses and that great dance music finally! The concert album is nice but there's little dance music and we have to hear Elaine Stritch trudge through Broadway Baby at a tempo slower than molases. Sorry Stritchy. You're great, but you take that song TOO slow!
Kiss Me, Kate has a nice OBCR but I prefer the revival album. It's just better. And despite what everyone says, those orchestrations are pretty damned good. I've heard some nasty things about them and I just don't get it. They're not bad.
Assassins' Roundabout revival's recording is better than the OOBCR. I like the cast, sound quality and orchestrations a lot more.
Gypsy with Merman is great, but Angela Lansbury acts the heck out of the part on the London album. I prefer it slightly to the OBCR, though I pine for Ethel sometimes. I don't always like the conductor's tempos on the London album, though.
I like Oklahoma! a heckuva lot more on the '98 London album. The sound quality is better and the performances are too.

Edited because I thought using the word "hell" might be pushing it for the moderators. It is a place, though. Updated On: 1/5/08 at 11:36 PM

[keen on kean]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#18

Posted: 1/5/08 at 11:45pm

Company

My Fair Lady - 1976 - because of the late Ian Richardson's incomparable Henry Higgins

[Scarywarhol]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#19

Posted: 1/6/08 at 12:15am

I have to agree with Company and Little Shop.

As Brick inferred, I meant "Better" as the one you prefer, even if you might know it is not really superior to the original in some ways. That's definitely how I feel about Sweeney.

[BobbyBubby]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#20

Posted: 1/6/08 at 12:43am

Don't you mean "You're a Good Man Jonathan Larson"?

And I think you like the sound quality a little more than the products themselves, for some of these revivals.

The Company revival? Sure, okay, but come on, that OBC is ELECTRIC!

[ray-andallthatjazz86]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#21

Posted: 1/6/08 at 12:51am

COMPANY? Really???? How?
I mean, Dean Jones, Elaine Stritch, Susan Browning, Pam Myers, Donna McKechnie, Merle Louise... no COMPANY cast has surpassed that. Sorry.
SUNDAY...I disagree, Bernadette Peters and Mandy Patinkin ARE Dot and George, in my mind. The new recording is better in terms of technical aspects though.
SWEENEY TODD is the one I understand the least. There is no way that Lansbury, Gaber, Jennings, Louise, Cariou, Rice, and Lyndeck were surpassed by the revival cast. And Tunick's orchestrations can't be matched by the anemic sound of the revival recording.
I would say that NINE is almost as good as the original yet not as good.
The chemistry and magic of the original cast of A CHORUS LINE can't be matched by the revival recording.
I think the CABARET revival is the only one that I can think comes close, but it still doesn't have Lotte Lenya or Joel Grey.

"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"

[neddyfrank2]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#22

Posted: 1/6/08 at 1:10am

Assassins revival is much, much, much better than the original.

[Mealz1042]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#23

Posted: 1/6/08 at 1:17am

company definitely

<-- Gwen Stewart, SOLoist at the last show of RENT
Cages or wings? Which do you prefer? Ask the birds. Fear or love, baby? Don't say the answer Actions speak louder than words. (Tick, Tick... BOOM!)

[Brick]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#24

Posted: 1/6/08 at 1:58am

You don't prefer ANY revival CDs to the originals, ray?

I think this thread is fun. By its very nature, it is blasphemous.

There is no defending any position beyond admiring improved technical aspects or new character interpretations. The originals, the creators, and therefore most often the definitive.

(Here's a huge slice of blasphemy: as much as I adore Lansbury and acknowledge her tremendous achievement in creating such a brilliant performance, I can't stand listening to her on the SWEENEY OBC.)

[IdinaBellFoster]

re: Revival Recordings Better than the Original#25

Posted: 1/6/08 at 2:01am

Assassins
Kiss Me Kate
Little Shop of Horrors
Sweet Charity
The Pajama Game
Sweeney Todd

"Oh look at the time, three more intelligent plays just closed and THE ADDAMS FAMILY made another million dollars" -Jackie Hoffman, Broadway.com Audience Awards