I'm sure Patina will come with it - Whoopi would insist on it. And it will be a star-is-born moment for her.
Broadway Legend Joined: 4/23/08
Keep in mind guys, that this show needs a lot of space for it's scenic aspect...
Isn't the Hirschfeld known for it's notoriously small wing space?
I am excited that this production is coming to Broadway. I saw this last week in the West End and truly enjoyed it. I really had no idea that I would. I saw a lot of theatre while I was there and it was by far one of the better shows.
It is true, there are a few kinks, like the gangsters and the incredibly long chase scene but I think that can be fixed. I expect that most will be very surprised with how much fun and how much heart is in this production.
Regarding Petina, wasn't there and interview with Whoopi and her talking about bringing it to Broadway with Petina as the star?
Broadway Legend Joined: 3/21/05
"Also...the equity exchange could very well be for one of the stars in LoVE NeVER DiES. Slater is the lyricist for both, so it could be to fulfill the impending exchange with that one. (Remember the Palladium is a Lloyd Webber house, so he very well could have worked this out with Slater) Trevor Nunn was still paying for the Woman in White equity exchange with Gone with the Wind when he cast Jill Paice (ironically again) as Scarlett!"
The Equity exchange rule is one-sided. British Equity does not require a British actor be cast in the Broadway production if an American actor is hired for the West End production.
I don't know what the critics will think of it, but it's a really fun score and Patina sounds amazing on the London cast recording. I hope that she comes over with the show. It would be a real "star making" performance.
I know I'm probably in the minority, but like the show itself, I thought Patina was just ok. Fantastic vocal performance and serviceable acting/comedy. I was really flummoxed and distracted by her strong Southern accent which sounds almost like a conscientious acting choice when she hammers home the twang, which doesn't really make sense anywhere in the script. Just one little line to give a little background as to why she might sound completely out of place would help tremendously, but maybe that's just me. I couldn't stop thinking about it the entire show. Love her singing, but she threw away so many comedic opportunities, the dialogue scenes came off as rather flat. I just didn't get the feeling of a "star-making" performance when I saw her in the show. Perhaps it was because I saw it on the heels of seeing Sheridan Smith in Legally Blonde, which REALLY felt like a new West End STAR was bursting onto the scene. Even though Sheridan's been on the West End previously, this is really a breakthrough performance for her. I just didn't get that vibe from Patina Miller.
Broadway Star Joined: 6/5/03
Didn't someone post on here are few months ago that SA in London was a financial flop and that they usually played to half empty houses? Why are they bringing it here?
I won't call it a flop. They're looking to move it to a smaller theater come November as it's playing in that huge London Palladium. I hope they're successful in finding a new theater by the fall.
The show absolutely soars during the numbers with the nuns. Otherwise, the songs are pretty mediocre. Not terrible, just eh. And the book is not good at all. That being said, I thought Patina was incredible. I hope she comes with it. The Hirschfeld would be too small for this show, but I hope it doesn't take the Marquis as I'm praying Priscilla will go in there. Sister Act could possibly fit into the Nederlander if Million Dollar Quartet closes.
I think the most recent update is that they are no longer seeking a new theatre for Sister Act in the West End. A smaller theatre would be something of an improvement as the giant rising cheese wheel was completely unnecessary to the staging. At times, I even found it to be distracting and oppressive, such as with the song Fabulous, Baby. The number seemed to be dwarfed by being perched atop the giant wheel which didn't exist for any other reason than to define the location of the nightclub (because nightclubs are often round?). Nothing of the sort was needed for any other locale in the musical. It was a piece of stage gimmicktry that simply wasn't justified. And unless it was already built into the theatre, I'm guessing it was pretty expensive to build and operate. Cutting the budget of the show can begin right there. They can also cut the cherub at the top of the house inside the theatre. It added nothing to the atmosphere and it did nothing. Spend the money on fixing the book and replacing three or four songs (mostly for the men).
Videos