Shirelles lawsuit against "Baby It's You!"
Broadway Star Joined: 1/28/04
Shirelles lawsuit against "Baby It's You!"#1
Posted: 4/27/11 at 11:57am
Some of the musical stars feel exploited.
http://blogs.villagevoice.com/dailymusto/2011/04/girl_group_laws.php#more
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#2
Posted: 4/27/11 at 12:01pmCould this be the nail that seals the show's coffin?
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#3
Posted: 4/27/11 at 12:05pm
Funny how they used a Shirelles european release on the Fontana label to illustrate that article and not an American release on Greenberg's Scepter label.
I don't know if it's been discussed here but what is the exact reason that "Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow"? is not in the show?
Updated On: 4/27/11 at 12:05 PM
Joined: 12/31/69
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/15/05
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#5
Posted: 4/27/11 at 12:10pm
This (like the lawsuit threatened against MDQ when it opened on Broadway) seems so ... calculated.
The show was doing amazingly well at Pasadena (as MDQ was doing in Chicago long before Broadway). Why not sue them then? When it began? Why wait for Broadway? Seems fishy to me.
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#6
Posted: 4/27/11 at 12:12pmHow interesting that the news comes out on opening night... seems just the teeniest bit calculated.
~Lina Lamont
My name wasn't, isn't, and will never be Scott.
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#7
Posted: 4/27/11 at 12:20pmI was thinking the same thing. Why now? The show has been around for awhile now. Why didn't they initiate this lawsuit when the show was in development?
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#8
Posted: 4/27/11 at 12:23pm
It is interesting how the lawsuit has nothing to do with unauthorized use of the Shirelles music (which I assume the production obtained the rights for) but for "unauthorized use of names, images and biographical information."
I don't know about the images, but I was under the impression that you could legally use the names and biographical information of public figures as long as it wasn't used in a libelous manner.
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#9
Posted: 4/27/11 at 12:40pm
Calculated is right. Is this what stars of the past do when they can't make any money anymore?
They have had since the very inception of this musical to file a suit. Bad timing....bull! Someone is looking to make a profit and waited until the show came to NYC to do so. Just sayin.
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#10
Posted: 4/27/11 at 12:48pmAlso, the producers of the show HAD to have sought legal advice before backing this musical, making sure all of the name use and such was legal. It seems so stupid that this lawsuit is arising. That, or the producers made one crucial mistake before signing the checks.
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#11
Posted: 4/27/11 at 12:57pm
"They have had since the very inception of this musical to file a suit. Bad timing....bull!"
No they didn't. That's not how lawsuits work. At the very inception of the musical how the hell would they be able to prove the musical is infringing if the musical hasn't been written yet?
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#12
Posted: 4/27/11 at 12:58pmconfused... what is MDQ?
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#13
Posted: 4/27/11 at 12:58pm
Hey, if YOU were gonna sue to A) earn money and B) get media attention, would you sue Pasadena Playhouse for pennies and a mention in the Pasadena papers, OR would you wait for Broadway and do it on opening night and get worldwide attention and a potential killer settlement?
No mystery here, folks.
As the old saying goes: you can take the girl out of the ghetto, but...
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#14
Posted: 4/27/11 at 1:01pm
"No they didn't. That's not how lawsuits work. At the very inception of the musical how the hell would they be able to prove the musical is infringing if the musical hasn't been written yet?"
Read billyboyA's' post..I meant since the show opened in California.I'm not a mind reader and I am sure the lawyers aren't either.
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#15
Posted: 4/27/11 at 1:05pm
Are they telling the Shirelles' actual story in this show? Or Dionne Warwick's?
Or is this another Dreamgirls-type fictionalized account?
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#16
Posted: 4/27/11 at 1:06pmWell they do say in the playbill that certain things have been changed/dramatized. I guess that's what they take issue with.
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#17
Posted: 4/27/11 at 1:08pm
But it's their life story on the stage? If so, they (might) have a case.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#18
Posted: 4/27/11 at 1:10pmEh, kind of I guess. It's about 20% their story, 20% of the white lady's story and 60% pointless songs that have nothing to do with anything at all.
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#19
Posted: 4/27/11 at 1:12pm
Actually, the more I think about it, they probably don't have a case.
Only if they were using material that belonged to the Shirelles, or using their actual likenesses (Shirelles photos, etc.) to sell the show. I could see them winning that.
But if it's just look-alikes and sound-alikes, singing songs that the Shirelles don't own the rights to, that probably won't cut it in court.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#20
Posted: 4/27/11 at 1:13pmMaybe they're just embarrassed to be associated with this p.o.s.
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#21
Posted: 4/27/11 at 1:15pm"Defamation of character." LOL
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#22
Posted: 4/27/11 at 1:17pm
LMAO @ Jordan: It's about 20% their story, 20% of the white lady's story and 60% pointless songs that have nothing to do with anything at all..
Shirelles lawsuit against 'Baby It's You!'#23
Posted: 4/27/11 at 1:25pm
"confused... what is MDQ?"
Million Dollar Quartet
Videos









