So, there's really no argument that the Billy boys worked hard, are sublimely talented, seem like nice fellas, etc. But ... should they have won a competitive Tony award? I still think NO.
I think that the Lead Actor/ Musical category was somewhat underwhelming this year - with no solid frontrunner - and I think that contributed to the voters decision to ultimately reward the Billys - there was no serious competition.
In another season, would they have won against Lane in The Producers or Stokes in Kiss Me Kate or Fierstein in Hairspray? Unlikely.
I do feel that the boys should have been given a special award (what they are doing as 14 year old boys is special), and I admit that I was touched by their reactions/speeches at the awards, but if I had been a voter I simply could not have justified choosing them over the other nominees.
Laughter is much more important than applause. Applause is almost a duty. Laughter is a reward.
Carol Channing