The WICKED recording is in no way a fair representation of this show. Compared to most cast recordings, Wicked's recording is actually quite fair in representation.
The thing I don't like about the Rent cast recording is that it's slower than the live production. Perhaps it is now, especially compared to what Rent has become, which was mostly sped up and phoned in so everyone can leave the theatre a bit more quickly. But if you compared the recording to the original production and cast, it is almost identical. The energy was still high, though it came through in the performances, not the tempos. The last time I saw Rent on Broadway, the quicker tempos had nothing whatsoever to do with energy. It was the amateur performances and sloppy management that brought down the entire show. Luckily, I had seen the show when it was still vibrant, but my poor boyfriend was seeing it for the first time and was hugely disappointed. He couldn't believe it was still running. I can't believe it was allowed to run in that condition. Awful.
As for Spring Awakening, I was mostly bored by the cast recording. Then I saw the show, which left me baffled. I agree that the CD does nothing to clue the listener in to the story or the concept of the musical, but I really don't think a complete or live recording is necessary either. The way the show is constructed is at odds with the idea of a representational cast recording. Regardless, I'm not a fan. Both the recording and the live performance left me cold, so in that sense, for me, the CD
does represent the show pretty accurately.
Craww - Re: Spelling Bee, I get what you're saying, but I find that I love listening to the cast recording, which actually reminds me of some of the clever staging I enjoyed so much. And I could listen to The I Love You Song on repeat for days.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian