"Two Gentlemen was a novelty show that quickly sank into much-deserved oblivion. Galt MacDermot's talent is a pedestrian one, albeit entertaining, much like that of Joe ("Rubber Ducky") Raposo."
I think MacDermot was a decent composer, but while I thought Verona was fun to watch, I really didn't like its score. However, Joe Raposo, who, by the way, wrote many wonderful Sesame Street songs but Rubber Ducky is not one of them - was, for me, a major composer - wonderful melodist and his score for A Wonderful Life has incredible stuff in it, and I'm really fond of his score for the Raggedy Ann and Andy movie, wretched as the film itself is -
I'm fond of Raposo's work as well (and he is credited as the writer or co-writer of "Rubber Ducky" in several places - see below; but false info has been found online and in books before...); but his work is melodically and harmonically very elementary. There's nothing wrong with that, but I've never seen him work in a richer vein (even having seen Raggedy Ann and It's A Wonderful Life).
It's not that I don't respect him - but I do have more respect for someone who can write a simple tune as well as an homage to Ravel as well as an 8-minute musical scene incorporating multiple complex themes (and ideas).
As for MacDermot - writing one "score that both did sound like contemporary rock music of the time, and was theatrically effective" is nice (even though I disagree with the oversimplification of both statements), but (in my opinion) overrated. I recommend listening to his flops for a fuller idea of his talent.
Oh, I don't actually think much of hisw later shows (yes Verona included) I almost hate to admit--though some of them probably deserve more of a listen from me. I don't think my statement was too simplific though--that's how I feel about the score of Hair. A fourth of it (OK that is a simplification--but a chunk of it), doesn't do much for me, so I have a hard trouble calling it brilliant, but what does work for me, really works. And I think the fact that it's been so hard to pull off a contemporary *rock* score (as opposed to a pop score or a rock pastiche score) in any musical since has emphasized that.
(On my one main Muppets album--a two record set Songs from Jim Henson's The Muppets which includes all the Henson properties, Rubber Ducky is simply credited to "Moss"--Raposo is actually only represented ont he album by the Sesame Street theme, C Is For Cookie, Not Easy Being Green, Happiness Hotel, and one of my fave Muppet moments, The First Time It Happens from Great Muppet Caper).
Sorry, Raposo had nothing to do with Rubber Ducky - it's Moss, solo-credited as such on the sheet music (from the book you reference on eBay - that description merely says there are songs by both, not that they had co-written together). A simple search on Google will give you the same information time and again - it's in the Wikipedia article that has a complete list of Sesame Street songs, as well as other places. But I have the sheet music and only Moss is credited, as it should be. I'll tell you how I know this definitively: I directed a club act for someone and we did a Raposo medley and included Rubber Ducky. An indignant Sesame Street fanatic came up to us after and said we were BAD for including a song Raposo hadn't written in a Raposo medley. So, we went home and checked the sheet music and sure enough, we were wrong.
And we can agree to disagree on Raposo - I don't know what "he never worked in a richer vein" means - he worked on the projects he worked on and his compositions for them were appropriate and wonderful.
Exactly. I'm not sure a musical theatre composer deserves less respect just because he didn't compose a sonata that sounded like Ravel, or whatever. It is a shame Raposo didn't get to do more with musical theatre (I've not heard Wonderful Life)--I do think his songs for Raggedy Ann (the animated version--I've only heard the bizarre Broadway version once or twice) are the highlight in a mess of a film.