Blaxx wrote:
Wasn't this the "critic proof" show of the decade? The one that showed that reviews are obsolete? The one that would run 250 years making a quazillion dollars on its way? Actually no, nor do I think many (if any) people said that it was (including me, though I'm certainly a fan of the show).
Of course, when it comes to TAF, a mocking comment is to be expected from Blaxx and dozens of others on this board. But at least mock something factual or something that was actually a widely-held belief and not revisionist history you're essentially making up now to suit your own need to slam the show yet again.
In truth, the majority of people (on BWW and elsewhere) have been predicting the demise of this show since the day its reviews came out (if not earlier) so the fact that it lasted as long as it did, well beyond Nathan's run, is a noteworthy accomplishment. Perhaps undeserved -- reasonable people can disagree about that -- but noteworthy nevertheless.
From what's been said publicly and been rumored, I don't think the show will have quite recouped by the time it closes. But with their tour launching and all those other productions happening in the next few years -- all of which will pay money back to the Broadway company in some fashion -- I'll bet it gets there within another year or two.
I do agree with the earlier poster who surmised that "Ghost" will be the next occupant of the Lunt (as Riedel has also suggested). Actually seems somewhat fitting following on the heels of the Addams clan.
"No matter how much you want the part, never let 'em see you sweat." -- Old Dry Idea commercial