All Hail the king
It is obvious.
How is it "obvious"?
Maybe Fun Home will become the greatest classic ever on Broadway, but for now The King and I is the better show because it was good 60 years ago and it is good today.
But that's a false comparison because you're saying that the sole criterion for which the shows should be compared is established longevity, so even when you admit that Fun Home does not meet the required criterion, you compare them anyway and claim that the apple is a better apple than the orange. It's like saying that the oak is a better tree than a rose.
I was always under the impression that awards were given out for excellence and not to send messages.
Perhaps the message of Fun Home is what the voters viewed as its excellence. It is entirely possible (and mostly probable) that the voters do not share your opinion of the show or your definition of "excellence".
All those nominated will have future chances. The team of K/E will not.
The team of Kander and Ebb had 50 years. The others have not. Should the award only go to the oldest established team in the category? If so, then we can just eliminate the nominations and voting process entirely.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
Updated On: 6/8/15 at 01:08 PM