"i must confess i am somehow wishing Tarzan is a big big hit...i have no desire to see it, BUT it took Movin' Out OUT of Broadway and it deserves to last for 20 years, because of it."
That's pretty harsh. So it's ok to slam Movin' Out, but not Woman in White? Kind of a double-standard, isn't it? And I don't really understand the rationale behind cheering on a show no matter how bad it is, and wishing for a 20-year run, simply because it booted out another show that was quite well-respected and popular, but you personally didn't like it. I hate Phantom of the Opera, but I'm glad others love it and it has kept actors employed for YEARS.
"You liked Bombay Dreams! So why should we take anything you say or think seriously?"
I loved Bombay Dreams. I wish I could see it again. That was such a fun show.
"Look at Cats...one of the longest running shows in broadway history. Does that make it fantastic theater?"
Actually, it was highly innovative when it opened. The concept, costumes, makeup, set design, and hit score made it an international phenomenon, all of which are artistic elements. I know it's fun to pooh-pooh twenty-some-odd years later, but it was quite spectacular in its day. So yes, I would say it was fantastic theatre. I think any show that can attract millions in various languages and a song whose melody is recognized almost anywhere in the world would count as "fantastic theatre". Will it be included in the college textbook for intellectual snobs? No, because they are too busy chattering about Sondheim to recognize that "theatre" is not just about the parts, but also the sum.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian