Parody and pastiche are quite different. Perhaps pictures might help:
[img]

[/img]
This is the original Warhol image of Marilyn Monroe, with which we're all probably familiar.
[img]

[/img]
Banksy produces a pastiche of the original, using Kate Moss instead of Marilyn, to make a point. At first glance, we might even think it is an original but Kate Moss as a sitter is not right and her expression is markedly different. So rather like Losing My Mind in Follies - we are given a piece that is very similar to a Gershwin number or a torch song, but it is used in a way that we might not expect to make a different point.
[img]

[/img]
The same cannot be said for this, which parodies the sitter in the style of Warhol and one could argue has something to say about the original. But we also understand it is not the original and we understand that our reaction is not to take it seriously (unless one is a Michael Jackson fan, perhaps). So like, You Could Drive A Person Crazy, the juxtaposition of the style of the song and the individuals involved, allow us to understand the situation and also to laugh at it.
[img]

[/img]
In this case, we have a print in a style reminiscent of Warhol. We understand it is neither an attempt to recreate the original nor make a point, it just gives us the Warhol ambiance. So just as a score of a musical maybe jazzy or have rock influences - it's not trying to persuade us that it is a specific writer, it's borrowing the flourishes of that style to give the piece a little colour.
Updated On: 6/5/11 at 08:46 AM