#26
Posted: 8/24/09 at 1:00am
Yes, Haven Burton would be a much more interesting, exciting choice.
What's Sutton gonna be up to next? — Page 2
#27
Posted: 8/24/09 at 9:35am
I said it in another thread, but I think that she should position herself to play Petra in the Little Night Revival.
She would get to play a little more with her sexiness instead of being the spunky heroine. And I think she would sing the crap out of the Miller's Son.
But I know it is a long shot, since it would be a downgrade to a "supporting" role (even though Petra is unquestionably a show-stealing role) But I think it would be a really great choice for her.
She would get to play a little more with her sexiness instead of being the spunky heroine. And I think she would sing the crap out of the Miller's Son.
But I know it is a long shot, since it would be a downgrade to a "supporting" role (even though Petra is unquestionably a show-stealing role) But I think it would be a really great choice for her.
Baritone in search of a role in a new musical...
#28
Posted: 8/24/09 at 2:03pm
I saw Sutton last week at Dylan's Candy Bar on the UES talking with a nice little girl and two adults.
No one recognized Sutton; although this was not surprising as she is NOT a star.
How many people bought her CD? The girl is just lucky, that's all. She has not one ounce of charisma. Just that Karen Ziemba smile like she is on a Noxzema commercial.
No one recognized Sutton; although this was not surprising as she is NOT a star.
How many people bought her CD? The girl is just lucky, that's all. She has not one ounce of charisma. Just that Karen Ziemba smile like she is on a Noxzema commercial.
Do you know what happens when you let Veal Prince Orloff sit in an oven too long?
#29
Posted: 8/24/09 at 3:20pm
I said it in another thread, but I think that she should position herself to play Petra in the Little Night Revival.
Leigh Ann Larkin has already been cast as Petra in the revival of A Little Night Music.
Leigh Ann Larkin has already been cast as Petra in the revival of A Little Night Music.
#30
Posted: 8/24/09 at 3:40pm
" I'd love to see her do something totally different."
Me too-like retail, maybe.
Me too-like retail, maybe.
<-----I'M TOTES ROLLING MY EYES
#31
Posted: 8/24/09 at 3:49pm
"But I know it is a long shot, since it would be a downgrade to a "supporting" role"
Sutton has done supporting roles, such as Janet in the Drowsy Chaperone. I believe she stated in an interview one time that she likes doing ensemble pieces where she does not have the weight of the show on her shoulders like she did with Millie. It wouldn't be a downgrade for her.
Sutton has done supporting roles, such as Janet in the Drowsy Chaperone. I believe she stated in an interview one time that she likes doing ensemble pieces where she does not have the weight of the show on her shoulders like she did with Millie. It wouldn't be a downgrade for her.
"We like to snark around here. Sometimes we actually talk about theater...but we try not to let that get in our way." - dramamama611
#32
Posted: 8/24/09 at 5:23pm
millie_dillmount, I am not sure that I would call the role of Janet Van Der Graff a supporting role.
"If you try to shag my husband while I am still alive, I will shove the art of motorcycle maintenance up your rancid little Cu**. That's a good dear"
Tom Stoppard's Rock N Roll
#33
Posted: 8/24/09 at 5:58pm
Yes, you are kind of right - they petitioned for Sutton Foster to receive a nomination in the "leading actress" category, but in Drowsy Chaperone, she was not the main focus of the show as she was in Millie. Her taking any supporting roles in a musical would not necessarily be a step down for her career.
I think she is nominated in the leading actress category because she is talented and within the theater community, quite popular. Personally, I see Fiona and Janet as more featured roles. Producers had to petition for her to be considered in the leading category because her name was not billed above the title. If they hadn't, she would have been nominated under supporting, obviously.
I think she is nominated in the leading actress category because she is talented and within the theater community, quite popular. Personally, I see Fiona and Janet as more featured roles. Producers had to petition for her to be considered in the leading category because her name was not billed above the title. If they hadn't, she would have been nominated under supporting, obviously.
"We like to snark around here. Sometimes we actually talk about theater...but we try not to let that get in our way." - dramamama611
Updated On: 8/24/09 at 05:58 PM
#34
Posted: 8/24/09 at 7:31pm
"No one recognized Sutton; although this was not surprising as she is NOT a star."
She is in the theater world (but nowhere else). I'd put her more into the 'not a celebrity' category. If you sent her to Hollywood, she'd be completely ignored by the paps.
She is in the theater world (but nowhere else). I'd put her more into the 'not a celebrity' category. If you sent her to Hollywood, she'd be completely ignored by the paps.
Tickets From $70
Tickets From $77
Tickets From $106
Tickets From $60