The authors seem to have never really settled on a definitive version of the show with Kenwright's production doing well in the UK but failing in the US. The current licensed version is apparently closer to the original West End production without all (or any?) of Kenwright's revisions so the success the show had in the UK seems not of consequence. Why say one thing, and then contradict it with the very next sentence? They did settle on a definitive version. They threw out Kenwright's changes in the licensed version. As that's what's licensed, I'd say that's pretty bloody definitive. :P (Although, frankly, there are a few things I'd add back into the piece that are on the cast recording and not in the final licensed version. They aren't massive material alterations, like Kenwright's clunky family-friendly material married to the dramatic score Steinman and Lloyd Webber fashioned, just a few little things that smooth out the cracks.)
I'm with Hal Prince, director of the 1996 D.C. tryout, on this one: "...the kids' roles were good and largely avoided sentimentality. And the title song was as beautiful as anything Andrew had ever written. I was taken with the potential for a kind of John Steinbeck, William Inge piece, a show about rural Americana in the past. I thought it had validity. I also never imagined that it could be a critical success, and that doesn't always matter. The original reviews of
The Sound of Music, another musical about children, were terrible, and besides, no one really remembers what the original reviews of a hit show are. I knew that
Whistle Down the Wind would likely be labeled as 'sentimental,' as
The Sound of Music had been, and correctly so, but I also felt it had a potentially irresistible quality. Going in, I felt it had all the ingredients to become a popular success, and I still think it would have been infernally popular."
Were I to give it a second chance, I'd think I'd use some of the original Washington orchestrations in place of the licensed London ones for particular songs. Washington's orchestrations were of a more folky/Cajun feel, which contrast to the outright rock that the London production ended up with (the only hint of the Washington orchestrations were in the occasional use of an harmonica and an electric violin [the latter Washington never utilized] - and the harmonica in the London production was a synth part). I think using the more rock-orientated orchestrations in the Amos/Candy numbers, as well as those of The Man, would contrast with the more naive Swallow et al., whose numbers should be more folky (although as Swallow progresses through the plot her numbers become more influenced by the rock). I especially love the original Washington orchestration of "Cold" as sung in the bar - it sounds more like something that would have been played in such a dive at the time.
Formerly gvendo2005
Broadway Legend
joined: 5/1/05
Blocked: After Eight, suestorm, david_fick, emlodik, lovebwy, Dave28282, joevitus, BorisTomashevsky, Seb28
Updated On: 2/8/15 at 06:02 AM