#1
Posted: 6/13/08 at 11:20pm
I don't get it. It has a cliched story (which one would take from the first person meta-narrative as the truth, but actually a lot of it is fiction--in real life Stew actually made it home before his mother died! ) The score is mediocre (well, it could have been great, but every time it feels like its going to break out into a real live melody it goes aborted or nowhere--its worse than a LaChuisa musical! ) I liked the set. But the drama in the piece is a whole lot tinier than Stew's ego. I was so pumped to see this show, love a good rock/modern musical. Viva la "Spring Awakening" and "In the Heights" and their parents "Rent" and "Hair". Plus, I'm very forgiving. Believe me. I make excuses for shows that probably don't deserve it (can you hear me "Legally Blonde"?) But "Passing Strange"'s near-bland score, emotionally confusing book, mixed in with the show's "We-are-just-too-cool-for-conventional-musical-theatre" attitude, the whole enterprise left a bad taste in my mouth. But the critics, who sent me there, loved the show. LOVED IT! If they're not predicting a Best Musical Tony win, they all say it "should" win. Huh? I say HUH??? I hear John Simon gave it a bad review. Yay John! Keepin' it real! Unlike the show that purports to do just that. A hypocritical musical. More bang for my Tony dollar!! Please God let it not win.
Updated On: 6/13/08 at 11:20 PM