The West End did not actually school Broadway since BWay's Jerry Mitchell helmed both productions. Oh, I know. It was just a better production than the original Broadway.
The difference, I believe, is the audience. I saw the show on Broadway and in London and both audiences were enthusiastic. The real difference was that the London production was in a more appropriate theatre for the size of the show, the direction was MUCH tighter, and Sheridan's acting was far superior. Much more nuanced and poignant. Not to mention, she was already well-established in comedy in the UK. Bundy never really rose above the level of "cute". Basically, Mitchell recognized what needed adjusting from the Broadway production and the casting of a more realistic and iconic Elle Woods brought the show up to the level it was originally intended. I just wish they could bring the show back to Broadway in a smaller house with Sheridan Smith so more people over here could see the difference. The London critics and audiences were simply getting to see a better version of the show than Broadway critics and audiences. To me, it was like seeing a modern version of a classic Golden Age musical comedy. I didn't get that feeling when I saw it on Broadway.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
Updated On: 9/8/11 at 12:05 PM