I love that the title of this thread is Worst Revival Ever! and most posters are claiming revivals of the past 5 years are the WORST EVER! Weighing in with an opinion if your first broadway show was 5 years ago, doesnt make sense to me, respectfully.
I disliked the revival of ITW, some elements were good, some serviceable, many terrible. Jack's mother and Little Red were horrible, one unable to remember her lines or get the timing together in her songs, the other seemed to have no idea where she was or what she was doing. Compared to scene stealers like Danielle Ferland and Barbara Byrne, this was inexcusable to me. Noone else came close to the performances of the original, save for John McMartin, who found so much in the role that Aldredge never did. It was a fine production, for a very good community theater...and it was far too soon to be revived.
It, however was not as bad as many others I've seen (tho I'd be a fool to claim I knew which revivals were the "Worst Ever.")
The Man of LaMancha revival w/ Stokes Mitchell was not anywhere near a fiasco, though it was too soon since the previous revival, one of the worst revivals I've ever seen was the Raul Julia revival in 92 with Sheena Easton completely out of her element. It was embarrassing.
I would put the On the Town revival in 98 on the shortlist. It was awful, save for DeLaria and Testa.
"Carson has combined his passion for helping children with his love for one of Cincinnati's favorite past times - cornhole - to create a unique and exciting event perfect for a corporate outing, entertaining clients or family fun."
"In Oz, the verb is douchifizzation."
PRS