wicked book
Nath
Stand-by Joined: 7/3/05
#0wicked book
Posted: 10/2/05 at 11:04pmHas anyone actually read the book? I had read the book (and a few of his others) before I heard about the musical. I do love the show but I think its sad how they veered so far away with the 'plot' esp with the ending... it feels like a test audience was screened and they wanted a happier ending. The ending of the book is so sad!
#1re: wicked book
Posted: 10/2/05 at 11:07pm
That was exactly how I felt.
Interesting coincidence about the "test audience" comment: When the LSOH movie was shown to test audiences (with the original ending), audienced disliked it so much that Frank Oz went back and reshot a happy ending. Kind of wrecked the point of it but oh well...
colleen_lee
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/16/05
#2re: wicked book
Posted: 10/2/05 at 11:14pm
I LOVE the book, but I guess I do see why they went the direction they went with the musical. The bottom line is the musical as it is now is far more marketable than I think it would have been had they stayed more faithful to the book.
Gregory Maguire isn't complaining, "Wicked" is on the best-seller lists 10 years after it was written as a result of the success of the musical.
Just started "Son of a Witch" a few days ago, hope it lives up to "Wicked".
#3re: wicked book
Posted: 10/2/05 at 11:23pmWHAT?! Son of A Witch is out already?! Must go to Barnes and Noble tomorrow!
colleen_lee
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/16/05
#4re: wicked book
Posted: 10/2/05 at 11:25pm
Get there now!
Came out on Tuesday.
#5re: wicked book
Posted: 10/2/05 at 11:29pm
Yes, SON OF A WITCH is out already and so far so good..
Jovie
#7re: wicked book
Posted: 10/2/05 at 11:32pm
i loved the book much more than the show. please don;t kill me but i was actually very dissapointed by the show!
edit- is son of a witch the sequal or something?
Nath
Stand-by Joined: 7/3/05
#8re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 12:16am
I understand most of the changes in the musical (ie bumbing up the role of Glinda so it is actually a starring role as opposed to a supporting role), just don't get whye they changed th end, we all know the witch dies, why re-write the classic story? and the whole scarecrow thing annoyed me to. What made the book so good was how it was almost a companion book to wizard of oz, wicked the musical has completely re-written it.
Gregory Maguire is clearly being far too nice, and clearly just riding on the success of the musical. I would still love to see a wicked book movie (kinda dark-labrynth-esque movie)
Fosse76
Broadway Legend Joined: 3/21/05
#9re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 12:24amBut at least it is keeping with history. The 1939 film barely resembles the L. Frank Baum story.
Nath
Stand-by Joined: 7/3/05
#11re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 12:29amdespite popular thoughts Glinda really isn't a leading role she is still Supporting
Nath
Stand-by Joined: 7/3/05
#12re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 12:47amin which? the book or musical? the book she is hardly in it, in teh musical she is huge in comparison, I guess its debatable. (kinda like the roxie/velma in chicago)
peach
Broadway Legend Joined: 3/29/05
#13re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 10:11am
"Gregory Maguire is clearly being far too nice..."
I doubt he has a problem with the story changing to suit the audience - imagine the royalties he is making as a result of the musical's success!
I read the Wicked novel long before seeing the musical. Excellent book. Son of A Witch looks good - and is getting good review. I wasn't as crazy about Mirror Mirror though. And, I have not yet read Stepsister, although I've heard it's a good one.
#14re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 10:18am
According to everything I've read, he's incredibly pleased with the changes made in the musical.
I'll probably get stoned by some of you for saying this, but I think Winnie Holzman was robbed of the Tony for Best Book. It's an incredible achievement to adapt that book so successfully.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
#15re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 11:27am
I like the book, but I've always felt the middle part drags quite a bit. That may just be me though.
>.> Still haven't gotten Son of a Witch. I prefer to wait for paperback (not a lot of money to throw around at the moment).
FlyingHigh2
Understudy Joined: 9/29/05
#16re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 3:14pm
I read the book before I saw the musical,and though the book was good, I enjoyed the musical (especially the ending) much, much more.
As stated above, Glinda has more of a supporting role and is present much more in the musical.
I have also started Son Of A Witch, it is good so far. I hope the ending of the musical is the ending of this book....I won't spoil for those who haven't seen it yet...
RentBoy86
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/15/05
#17re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 3:20pmI agree WickedScoundrel - I'm in the middle of the book right now, I starting reading it in June! But it started dragging and then I saw the musical finally in Chicago in July and kind of got over it, but I still want to finish it. Its starting to pick back up again. I wish there was more of them at school, I like that part the best.
FlyingHigh2
Understudy Joined: 9/29/05
#18re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 3:23pmRenyBoy I completely agree! The middle lags alot. It starts to pick up though.
#19re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 5:48pm
Winnie Holzman did not get robbed of the Tony for best book! I mean, the book is not only adapting the story to the stage but also providing character depth and developing the musical story properly which Holzman does not do. In another thread we discussed how nothing happens between "The Wizard and I" and "What Is This Feeling?" so the passionate loathing between Galinda and Elphaba is not really accounted for, the whole thing at the end saying that Elphaba is so powerful because she is mixed makes no sense, like they never explain in the show that mixed people are powerful, and Fiyero is extremely underwritten regardless of the fact that it's a supporting role, there are many supporting roles on Broadway that are very well-written.
I extremely love Wicked but I think Schwartz and Mantello are responsible for the great moments in the show, not Holzman.
#20re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 6:41pm
"despite popular thoughts Glinda really isn't a leading role she is still Supporting"
i beg to differ. if it wasn't a lead role why'd ms chenoweth get nominated for "best actress" in a musical? if it was a supporting role she'd've been nominated for best "featured" actress
#21re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 7:23pm
Ray --- I know EXACTLY what a book is to a musical, and I still say Winnie was robbed.
My opinion, of course.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
DramaDork925
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/4/05
#22re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 8:00pmI read Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister but the present tense style of writing eventually got to me. I think Wicked is written that way too but I didn't even notice. I was enthralled the entire time. I am getting Son of the Witch ASAP!!!
ashley0139
Broadway Legend Joined: 1/3/05
#23re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 8:08pm
I read the book after I saw the show, but I enjoyed it immensely. The thing is, basically, you can't look at then like the same story. They are two almost completely different stories that have SOME of the same characters. Basically, I think of them as two completely different things. When you think of it like that, they are both great.
#24re: wicked book
Posted: 10/3/05 at 8:31pm
Nath, learn to use the search feature, this has been talked about SO many times.
The book was SO much better than the musical.....and SO many have no idea of that. I liked the musical. I loved the book
Videos










