Profile for binau

The8re phan said: "sorry, but attendance issues aside, Alex Newell has earned this role and would absolutely bring down the house whenever they go on as Effie. Just asI have earned being in the audience multiple times whenever they do so........"

I would be very keen to hear Alex Newell sing this score but isn't attendance especially for this kind of role a necessary condition for it to ever work? The role and score would also be a lot more demanding than Alex N

DrMonicaDeMoneco said: "TotallyEffed said: "DrMonicaDeMoneco said: "TKTS has last rowmezz Cabaret tickets for $80. On Cabarets website, they’re selling orchestra tix for $62. What the what?"


Just trying to get rid of tickets anywhere they can."

But why are they more $$$ at tkts? Should I just go to the box office?"

It's likely just disconnected systems/processes. TKTS are probably discounting

In most cases the shows that are staying open losing money every week are in previews are they not? So pretty much all the money is gone either way and if they give up they’ll certainly never win (maybe happy ending also has probably given a precedent for this practice to continue). 

However, for most shows that are in a run are there many producers who keep the shows open way too long? Is it not the case that they at least try to break even and if starts to go in the red th

I don’t know what people think of Bill Maher but I am sympathetic to his ideas yes. 

I think you’re confused if you believe that trying to get us all to agree political violence is not ok means defending Charlie Kirk. What I’m really trying to do is first get some of you to see that we do have very extreme attitudes here that are the literal definition of terrorism (can we all just sit for a moment and reflect what we think the implication of this is if we sc

Sutton, you are unhinged. Most people except for you have at least acknowledged they condemn the violence even if they have no sympathy for his death. 

You have said that you support the violence, so you support terrorist attitudes. 

theatrefan4 - thanks for being honest. I think it’s implicit in therefore what you are saying that you think violence is a legitimate political strategy. I am saddened to hear that - I know it might not feel like terrorism but all te

Sutton, you’re being extremely disingenuous. If you agree that Charlie Kirk should have faced violence for his political views - which you just did on the off topic board - you hold terrorist attitudes. It’s just a logical necessary conclusion because that is what terrorism is. Now what you’ve done is twisted the whole thing to make it seem like if someone doesn’t agree with me generally. 
 

If you believe political violence is legitimate you are

I think it’s always about asking yourself what goal are we trying to achieve? If we are trying to minimise violence yes it is important for someone to be the bigger person and stop. Look at what Israel are doing in Gaza and keep saying ‘but October the 7th’ to kill 100,000 people. Violence breeds more violence. Yes Israel were attacked first but they could have been the bigger person to respond differently. 

If it’s Charlie Kirk that is killed and the

It’s not about who did what or who is worse or who is a hypocrite because yes everything you are saying is probably true. However, if you are saying to me now that the mainstream dominant opinion held by the left and right apparently in the USA is that violence is an acceptable strategy for dealing with political disagreement you are saying that terrorism is ok and you are normalising terrorism. 

The consequence of this is anarchy. Genuinely. It’s terrible. It’s

TheatreFan4 said: "binau said: "You don’t need to have any sympathy but to stop the cycle of violence we ALL need to mutually agree that there is no justification for violence or threat of violence from people who are expressing their political views. Do you agree with that? Will you explicitly agree to the phrase I posted above theatrefan4? Or if you don’t say that you don’t so we can see where you stand."

I'm not playing your game

KrupYou, will you or any other posters on this forum explicitly endorse this statement as true? Can I ask every forum member who agrees with this statement to like this post? If it’s ignored I think it’s clear what is going on here. 

“If Charlie Kirk was murdered for expressing his political views, this was wrong. No one deserves to be murdered for their political views. There is no justification. We must protect the right for people to express themselve