Profile for binau

I don't remember seeing a Snow White or Sleeping Beauty

More photos

https://www.instagram.com/p/DSFnN_mDS-J/?utm_source=ig_embed

Thanks that is good you paid attention to it so we can be sure I agree then from what you described it does look like there is a little bit of an impact which is cool for Nicholas C. 

Ok so just so I understand were all of his absences actually pre scheduled? 

EricMontreal22 said: "And I admit, I'm not even sure how to gauge if the past two Sunday in the Park revivals were successful or not... The 2008 was a limited engagement,so does that count? (Another Sondheim show, Company's first revival was also a Roundabout limited engagement that almost transferred but... didn't) And the 2017 Gylenhaal revival was also a limited run that obviously sold well during that limited time but...

(I guess this is where answers to the original question get complicated.)"

The 2017 Sunday in the Park with George revival recouped after just 56 performances or 7 weeks. WOW. And that was only in 2017.......I'm guessing today it would take months. 

I do remember at the time it had the highest grossing weeks of any Sondheim musical ever on Broadway (the Bernadette Follies actually previously had the record for highest week, but that was a much larger theatre and the success was short lived). 

https://playbill.com/article/sunday-in-the-park-with-george-starring-jake-gyllenhaal-will-be-preserved-on-a-cast-recording

Scanning the Sunday (2008) grosses, we can be certain the 2017 revival was more financially successful so it KIND of counts in a roundabout way, even though it probably isn't fair to compare a not-for-profit to a A-list star commercial broadway. 

https://www.broadwayworld.com/grosses/SUNDAY-IN-THE-PARK-WITH-GEORGE

Sunset still earned more than half of its investment back, won multiple Tonys, had some brief cultural impact and had many, many weeks of good business all of which QoV could only dream of. So I guess it depends on what you mean by decent but let’s not pretend it was a catastrophic failure. This is also in an environment where now almost no musicals make a profit on Broadway. 

There must be some other examples of this but it's striking how successful RAGTIME is now compared to the previous revival. This can only be a good thing because it means that even if there are revival flops people can always point to Ragtime as an example of why they could try again (so for example maybe someone will finally do the Audra Follies). The same way people can always point to Maybe Happy Ending to say that the 'little show that could' can turn things around. 

This almost looks like a capture from a film not a stage production. Truly stunning. 

I don't think you can pretend that there was ever an option for her 'coming back to Broadway'. I suspect she is just taking what opportunities are available to her. 

Does anyone know why in Feb and March there are a few dates without a Saturday matinee?

....

Thank you, I wasn't sure if Sutton was just being Sutton and making things up again Arnold based on this event (appears so) or if there was anything truthful to what they are saying. I mean, it could still be true but I don't think you can infer anything about that from this event. 

Does he have a substance use disorder? Is this public knowledge? 

 

ColorTheHours048 said: "Dude’sa dummy, but he’sultimately going to be just fine (and write a terrible “play” about it)."

WE END UP BEING THE TRUE VICTIMS OF THIS CRIME!!!

He also has no need to. Daniel successfully transitioned from child actor to diverse avant garde adult actor who is respected artistically, a box office draw and while always will be known and loved as Harry Potter can be seen as other characters. It’s pretty much the best case outcome for a child actor. Paid handsomely. There is no way he needs to milk the Harry Potter franchise anymore the same way his co-star does.