for there to be a really young (17-19) Belle or christine if they have an amazing voice? I know they usually put 20s, but if there was someone really amazing and young would there be a chance at broadway or a national tour? thanks, i'm just curious, I was having this debate with a friend the other day.
Christy Carlson Romano played Belle, and I think she's only about nineteen... maybe twenty. Not that she has an amazing voice, but it's certainly been done.
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/31/69
I think she was the youngest Belle ever.
She was pretty good at Bway on Bway... but heck Im a fan.
I think as Belle it would work and if Im not mistaken Emmy was only 16 when she was cast in Phantom.
In my opinion it would be better to cast these two roles with someone younger.
Sandra Joseph looked too old to play Christine, or too tired when I saw the show in April.
I would think the minimum they would probably want was 18 unless the kid was an independent due to child labor laws.
Megan Campbell was only 18 (or 19 at the most) when she covered Sutton in Mille.
thanks, just bumping this
They won't care if you lie that you're 20 on your resume.
Understudy Joined: 6/6/05
Until you get in huge trouble with Equity- under 18 is a different contract. And just for the record, I've been told not to put your age on your resume anyway- it makes the auditors look at you in a different light instead of seeing how you look on stage.
i don't know. seems like sometimes people just look at past work instead of newer potential
It would be possible. Someone already said Christy Carlson Romano for Belle. I think if the person is good and has technique and the auditors liked what they saw then a person younger than twenty should be cast. As someone else said I wouldn't put my age on a resume anyway.
Videos