Are you pro-choice or pro-"life"? — Page 3
#52
Posted: 9/11/08 at 9:51am
Jane hit the nail right on the head, too!
#53
Posted: 9/11/08 at 9:52am
#54
Posted: 9/11/08 at 9:55am
Save those nails in case the Supreme Court overturns Roe v Wade. We might need them!
#55
Posted: 9/11/08 at 9:56am
Pro-choice.
If I was a woman, I honestly don't know if I could go through with one, but I would never deny the right to someone else as long as it wasn't being used as a form of birth control.
If it were made illegal, it would still exist...it would just go underground and become more dangerous.
If I was a woman, I honestly don't know if I could go through with one, but I would never deny the right to someone else as long as it wasn't being used as a form of birth control.
If it were made illegal, it would still exist...it would just go underground and become more dangerous.
#56
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:00am
MTF3, what fantasy world are you living in?
At 8 weeks gestation, your "cluster of cells" is in constant motion. At 11 weeks gestation, your "cluster of cells" is sucking its thumb. Somewhere around the 4th month, your "cluster of cells" responds to light and pain stimuli. Your "cluster of cells" has fingers, toes, nails, eyes; pretty much all the equipment. He or she will kick, sleep, wake, swallow and pee.
Sure, it's a woman's body. If she chooses to abort, it's her choice, and her conscience. That said, she (and her partner) should know all the facts.
That said: No more wire hangers. Ever.
At 8 weeks gestation, your "cluster of cells" is in constant motion. At 11 weeks gestation, your "cluster of cells" is sucking its thumb. Somewhere around the 4th month, your "cluster of cells" responds to light and pain stimuli. Your "cluster of cells" has fingers, toes, nails, eyes; pretty much all the equipment. He or she will kick, sleep, wake, swallow and pee.
Sure, it's a woman's body. If she chooses to abort, it's her choice, and her conscience. That said, she (and her partner) should know all the facts.
That said: No more wire hangers. Ever.
#57
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:01am
"Jane hit the nail right on the head, "
thank you, ghost! I've been wanting to hit a nail on the head for so long!
thank you, ghost! I've been wanting to hit a nail on the head for so long!
<-----I'M TOTES ROLLING MY EYES
#58
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:03am
Kelzama, what is your description for the cluster at 5 weeks?
<-----I'M TOTES ROLLING MY EYES
#59
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:03am
Why are you questioning my beliefs? I didn't question your beliefs, and you are the one who asked the question in the first place.
You can't change my mind, and we can't get you off of here, so just respect my opinion please.
This is the position that always amuses me. I'm pro choice. You're pro life. You're asking me to respect your opinion but at the same time the vast majority of people who share your opinion wants to have my opinion be illegal.
I don't want to stop anyone from being Pro-Life if that is what they choose. The issue is that we should all have that choice.
You can't change my mind, and we can't get you off of here, so just respect my opinion please.
This is the position that always amuses me. I'm pro choice. You're pro life. You're asking me to respect your opinion but at the same time the vast majority of people who share your opinion wants to have my opinion be illegal.
I don't want to stop anyone from being Pro-Life if that is what they choose. The issue is that we should all have that choice.
#61
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:07am
I got to admit I am pro-life, and I am the Sarah Palin type of pro-lifer myself. It really is very black or white for me. Shades of grey don't exist.
Take that as you may.
Take that as you may.
#62
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:08am
Never mind, Kelzama, I looked it up. Very interesting, really. A lot of things are taking place at 5 weeks.
Well, at planned parenthood, 5 weeks was the earliest the doctors were able to detect a pregnancy. Any earlier and they won't perform an abortion. So it sounds like a woman who wants one has no choice but to wait for 5 weeks. At that point, it appears to be a blood clot to the human eye.
Well, at planned parenthood, 5 weeks was the earliest the doctors were able to detect a pregnancy. Any earlier and they won't perform an abortion. So it sounds like a woman who wants one has no choice but to wait for 5 weeks. At that point, it appears to be a blood clot to the human eye.
<-----I'M TOTES ROLLING MY EYES
Updated On: 9/11/08 at 10:08 AM
#63
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:12am
Another thing I don't like about pro-choice vs pro-life is that it makes discussion very difficult. The two sides worked so hard picking the most effective name for their opinions that the two aren't mututally exclusive and it is difficult to tell EXACTLY where people stand.
Urban, are you pro-life in that you think abortion is terrible and you would never have one (putting gender aside)? Are you pro-life in that you think abortion is terrible and no one should ever have one? Are you pro-life in that if someone said "Urban! It's down to you! Are we making abortion illegal or keeping it as is" that you would ban it outright?
Just want to make sure we're all on the same page. (Also, do you have a uterus?)
Urban, are you pro-life in that you think abortion is terrible and you would never have one (putting gender aside)? Are you pro-life in that you think abortion is terrible and no one should ever have one? Are you pro-life in that if someone said "Urban! It's down to you! Are we making abortion illegal or keeping it as is" that you would ban it outright?
Just want to make sure we're all on the same page. (Also, do you have a uterus?)
#64
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:12am
"Jane2: My definition? A baby"
That's where we differ. I say it has the potential to be a baby. I don't consider it to be a baby when it's missing almost everything it needs to exist.
That's where we differ. I say it has the potential to be a baby. I don't consider it to be a baby when it's missing almost everything it needs to exist.
<-----I'M TOTES ROLLING MY EYES
#65
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:16am
It can't survive outside of it's mother at that point so while it may be a life form it isn't "alive".
It's not unlike a parasite and it's host.
That said - I'm one of those pro-choice people who would choose life and would prefer others to choose life, but I respect their right to choose.
It's not unlike a parasite and it's host.
That said - I'm one of those pro-choice people who would choose life and would prefer others to choose life, but I respect their right to choose.
Updated On: 9/11/08 at 10:16 AM
#66
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:18am
"Pro Choice - the last thing we need are a lot of unwanted babies, the world is already overpopulated."
^First of all, that's probably the worst explanation for being pro-choice that I've ever heard.
Second, I'm completely pro-life. I don't believe that anyone has the right to take another's life (unless in self defense of course) except God.
Third, here's something to think about. It's illegal to kill the egg of an eagle, but abortion is legal. Very interesting...
^First of all, that's probably the worst explanation for being pro-choice that I've ever heard.
Second, I'm completely pro-life. I don't believe that anyone has the right to take another's life (unless in self defense of course) except God.
Third, here's something to think about. It's illegal to kill the egg of an eagle, but abortion is legal. Very interesting...
www.tinydancer5.tumblr.com
#67
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:21am
It's not the worst reason. It's a pretty good reason. Why are people so obsessed with creating genetic clones of themselves when there are millions of children out there who aren't just a mass of potential, they already exist, and they need love? If you gave me half an hour, I could dig out newspaper articles backing up the fact that the last thing the environment needs is more people. I am multi-tasking right now though, so am running around between posts. XP
I think it boils down to: are you pure pro-life (no abortion for anyone for any reason), are you pro-life and pro-choice (you don't like abortion but you wouldn't outlaw it), or are you pure pro-life (let the person whose uterus it is decide, no questions or stipulations)?
I'm pretty sure that pro-choice people are also pro-life. :P
I think it boils down to: are you pure pro-life (no abortion for anyone for any reason), are you pro-life and pro-choice (you don't like abortion but you wouldn't outlaw it), or are you pure pro-life (let the person whose uterus it is decide, no questions or stipulations)?
I'm pretty sure that pro-choice people are also pro-life. :P
Updated On: 9/11/08 at 10:21 AM
#69
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:24am
It's illegal to kill the egg of an eagle, but abortion is legal. Very interesting...
That's pretty easy to understand. The bald eagle is an endangered species. Humans certainly are not!
That's pretty easy to understand. The bald eagle is an endangered species. Humans certainly are not!
<-----I'M TOTES ROLLING MY EYES
#70
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:27am
Im between a rock and a hard place on this one. I always have been. Having a strict and devout Roman Catholic upbringing, it's clear that I was "taught" to be pro-life. Though I think I'm a little bit of both.
I obviously don't think abortion should be used as a method of contraception (and I know some women who have had multiple abortions - I'm talking 6, 7 and 8 - because they're simply careless) and be abused, but I also don't think any woman should be forced to keep a child they don't want or don't want to be responsible for. To that end, to the people who tell me she should just carry the child to term and give it up for adoption, I don't think a woman should be have to do that either.
Nor do I think any woman who is a victim of rape should feel guilty for not wanting to bring that child to term.
I guess you could say, after all that, I'm pro-choice.... as long as someone isn't abusing the procedure.
I obviously don't think abortion should be used as a method of contraception (and I know some women who have had multiple abortions - I'm talking 6, 7 and 8 - because they're simply careless) and be abused, but I also don't think any woman should be forced to keep a child they don't want or don't want to be responsible for. To that end, to the people who tell me she should just carry the child to term and give it up for adoption, I don't think a woman should be have to do that either.
Nor do I think any woman who is a victim of rape should feel guilty for not wanting to bring that child to term.
I guess you could say, after all that, I'm pro-choice.... as long as someone isn't abusing the procedure.
"You're every gay man's wet dream!" ~ MA
If in Heaven you don't excel, you can always party down in hell...
#71
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:28am
Actually, I will fling one link out there:
Doctors' advice to Britons: have fewer children and help save the planet
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/25/population.health
And here's another one that doesn't prove any of my points, but is a nice example of a cross between pro-choice and pro-life and may prove interesting topic-related reading for y'all:
Abortion from a doctor's perspective
http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/health/abortion-from-a-doctor-s-perspective-251298/
Doctors' advice to Britons: have fewer children and help save the planet
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/25/population.health
And here's another one that doesn't prove any of my points, but is a nice example of a cross between pro-choice and pro-life and may prove interesting topic-related reading for y'all:
Abortion from a doctor's perspective
http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/health/abortion-from-a-doctor-s-perspective-251298/
#72
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:32am
Weez - I'm a dude to answer that question.
If I was a politican and had to vote for/against, then yes, I would vote to ban it. It is just my personal position on the matter. I believe life begins at conception.
If I was a politican and had to vote for/against, then yes, I would vote to ban it. It is just my personal position on the matter. I believe life begins at conception.
#73
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:34am
"I guess you could say, after all that, I'm pro-choice.... as long as someone isn't abusing the procedure."
You see, CJR-that's what we're saying though-if there are stipulations, then you're not pro-choice. If abortions are legal, a woman can have as many as she wants, for any reason.
You see, CJR-that's what we're saying though-if there are stipulations, then you're not pro-choice. If abortions are legal, a woman can have as many as she wants, for any reason.
<-----I'M TOTES ROLLING MY EYES
#74
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:45am
Since when is "the world is overpopulated" a valid reason to kill someone? If someone was convicted of murdering another adult and their reason was "because the world is overpopulated", I'm pretty sure that wouldn't fly. Why is it applicable to a baby then?
www.tinydancer5.tumblr.com
#75
Posted: 9/11/08 at 10:47am
If it's your personal opinion and you know it's your personal opinion, why would you vote to impose your personal opinion on other people who do not share that opinion?
The debate isn't "is abortion a lovely fluffy thing filled with bunnies, or is it the most heinous evil ever rained down upon mankind?". The real issue, the one that is truly scary, is "is it right to say 'my opinion is better than yours, therefore I'm going to make this decision that will affect a great many people, especially the ones who don't agree with me'?".
No one's saying that abortion is a good thing or that women should go out and have millions. Christ, the real crux of this debate goes back at least as far as King Arthur legend: LET THE WOMAN CHOOSE FOR HERSELF.
When you say "I'd ban abortion", you're not saying "I don't like abortion". You're saying "I don't think anyone should be allowed to choose abortion for themselves no matter what the circumstance". Gee. Thanks.
The debate isn't "is abortion a lovely fluffy thing filled with bunnies, or is it the most heinous evil ever rained down upon mankind?". The real issue, the one that is truly scary, is "is it right to say 'my opinion is better than yours, therefore I'm going to make this decision that will affect a great many people, especially the ones who don't agree with me'?".
No one's saying that abortion is a good thing or that women should go out and have millions. Christ, the real crux of this debate goes back at least as far as King Arthur legend: LET THE WOMAN CHOOSE FOR HERSELF.
When you say "I'd ban abortion", you're not saying "I don't like abortion". You're saying "I don't think anyone should be allowed to choose abortion for themselves no matter what the circumstance". Gee. Thanks.
BroadwayWorld TV
Ticket Central