I was hooked from the first episode- especially the bit with Fred Armisen was hysterical. Not many shows make me laugh out loud but BROAD CITY succeeds. The duality of Ilana and Abbi is perfect, akin to a Leverne and Shirey but raunchier.
This article below sums up my feelings best, but mostly this sentence: "That’s why binge-watching Broad City, which I did this weekend, was the most relieving, liberating thing I’ve done to myself all semester. It stars two young twentysomethings with ****ty jobs, no money, no plans, and no plans to change. Ilana and Abbi just care about getting high, getting laid, and getting paid — and only as a means to achieve the first two. They have no preoccupying anxiety about becoming somebody, or finding love, or financial stability. Unlike every other slacker comedy, it’s relatable — Ilana and Abbi are as educated, neurotic, and self-absorbed as you are. But they’re okay. Broad City makes aimlessness look really, really okay."
I have to say though, the comparison to GIRLS, while understandable and inevitable seems sort of unwarranted to me. Like, they both have female leads and are set in New York City. They're different. I enjoy both, and yes, in many ways I think BROAD CITY is more honest, but I also think GIRLS is honest to a different demographic...if that makes sense.
I also am quoting this show obsessively. "I degraded my friend for you!"/"So far we've been rejected by 13 guys...and 1 female."/"Thank you for your...terrifying services" et al.
Why Broad City Is Doin It Right
Updated On: 4/2/14 at 10:41 AM