Foley (R-FL) the page-lover can't spell "bulge"
#250hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 9:09am
And now, our daily wisdom from Joseph Farah in his warning to his flock:
You are nothing but a breeder for these folks. You work your little job and pay your taxes so these folks can get their welfare check, get their operations, import their immigrant "friends" and recruit your kids into their lifestyle.
That's about the size of it. And, if you don't like the agenda, you are nothing but a non-compassionate bigot and intolerant homophobe.
God will not be mocked for much longer. And, when it comes, I wouldn't want to be in the neighborhood of those "tolerant" of these kinds of lies and perversion.
#251hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 9:52am
I'd love to see the scores of faggots on welfare when most reports show the gay community has a CONSIDERABLY higher income median. Also, my evangelical churchgoing neighbors and friends from home? WAY more likely to be on welfare.
I also love how we all need our "operations" and, god dang it, if one more militant homophobe accuses me of converting today's youth to our lifestyle, I might just have to start trying.
#252hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 10:09amThe fact that people in the media are still referring to Foley as a pedophile is a bit messed up to me. I'm really not sure if the situation had been between a guy and a 16 year old girl that you would still hear all the same "disgusting" type adjectives thrown around. The fact that the guy abused his power in such a way is not acceptable, but yeah, sketchiness abounds as far as some of the reactions go.
#253hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 10:15am
Really? You don't think they'd call him a pedophile? I think they would. In fact, 99% of those "We go behind the scenes to confront these pedophiles" exposes on the news always seem to target married men going after young girls.
#254hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 10:29am#255hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 10:51am
Here's another interesting definition, which sort of indicates that professionals by and large include pedophilia to be anyone who falls under statutory laws:
an adult whose primary sexual interest is in children; some professionals make a differentiation between a pedophile, whose sexual partner of choice is a prepubertal child, and a hebephile, who is aroused by adolescents.
nccanch.acf.hhs.gov/pubs/usermanuals/sexabuse/sexabuseh.cfm>
#256hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 10:53amThen "Pedophile" would be a very ambiguous term, as statutory laws are different from state to state. So, as they've been saying, what might be "pedophilia" in Florida could be just "hooking up with a rather young partner" in Washington, D.C.
#257hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 10:57amNot even concerning Foley, one thing that's always been interesting to me is when you see someone immediately start showing interest in an actor or actress openly once they turn 18. Obviously, I understand that there are laws for a reason as far as the age of consent goes, but for people to pretend that they had no feelings at all for the person like a day before their birthday is just funny to me.
#258hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 11:37amWhat does "import their immigrant 'friends'" mean? I wish we could do that, unfortunatly marriage discrimnation doesn't allow me to. I love when people use "welfare checks" in any argument.
#259hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 11:56amWell, the context of the column, to which I'll spare you having to see the link, starts out about some seminars here in New York for GLBT folk coping with poverty and their immigration status. And then he kind of careens off the cliff from there.
#260hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 12:03pmWell gay immigrants can't marry gay people (anywhere in this country) so there is no one coming in that way. There are paper marriages, but that is NOT a gay thing. It's a real b!tch to fall in love with someone out of the states. Even if we get some form of marriage for gays, I doubt very much we will have the right to sponsor our partners.
#261hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 12:36pm
That drudge article that was posted here yesterday? The one that claimed to have corroborating evidence and witnesses to debunk the factualness of those IMs?
You guys remember that one?
Well, the former page’s lawyer debunked it and Drudge has removed it. No retraction, not further posting of its accuracy.
Just.
Gone.
Kind of like the Republican majority in November.
#262hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 12:38pmAh, just like the John Kerry affair story. Now where's the conservative outgage a la Dan Rather?
#263hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 2:40pmIt's still up there. I haven't seen it present anywhere else yet. I can't believe Foley is still not behind bars. Something is up.
#264hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/6/06 at 2:41pm
"Well gay immigrants can't marry gay people (anywhere in this country) so there is no one coming in that way. There are paper marriages, but that is NOT a gay thing. It's a real b!tch to fall in love with someone out of the states. Even if we get some form of marriage for gays, I doubt very much we will have the right to sponsor our partners."
Yeah, tell me about it. I've been singing that song for over four years now.
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#265hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/7/06 at 1:25pm
when you read this piece on MEDIA MATTERS, you can understand how people would be confused about the dems culpability in this.
MEDIA MATTERS
FindingNamo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
#266hastert to take blame!
Posted: 10/7/06 at 1:58pm
Singer, here's a link to a late '90s report (or a summary of the report with a link to the actual report included in that) that shows the lie of the myth of gay wealth.
It's an accepted untruth that was first concocted by folks trying to market their gay magazines to mainstream advertisers, perpetuating the image of upper middle class white gay men without children and PILES of disposable income ... and that is now perpetuated by "[r]ight-wing organizations and individuals..." in order to create the image of the lavender mafia, an entitled class of people who couldn't POSSIBLY have anything in common with the poor folks who previously struggled for civil rights.
link
Videos


