Is This the Future of America?

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 12/21/24 at 10:56am

When House Speaker Mike Johnson brokered a bipartisan deal to avoid a government shutdown, it seemed like progress. But within 24 hours, Republicans abandoned the agreement, stripping critical measures from their alternative bill. Among the casualties were protections and programs with real, human stakes:

    •    Consumer protections and efforts to regulate deepfake pornography

    •    Funding for semiconductor supply chains and restrictions on investment in China

    •    Life-saving provisions for pediatric cancer research

One of the most devastating cuts was the Gabriella Miller Kids First Research Program, a bipartisan initiative supporting pediatric cancer research. Named after a 10-year-old girl who lost her life to an inoperable brain tumor, this program was stripped from the GOP’s version of the bill, alongside funding to help children on Medicaid access complex medical care across state lines. Nancy Goodman, founder of Kids v. Cancer, called it “a completely heart-wrenching outcome.”

And this all comes right in time for Christmas—a season that’s supposed to remind us of generosity, hope, and compassion.

If this is where America is headed for the next four years, what does that mean for our most vulnerable? For our future? For our values?

 

[Bwaygurl2]

Posted: 12/21/24 at 11:04am

I can only hope Trump gets fed up with musk and more fiascos like this can be avoided. 

[Jay Lerner-Z]

Posted: 12/21/24 at 12:01pm

I’m afraid so.

It’s all just a game to these people, a sport.

Real-life consequences for ordinary people are completely irrelevant to them.

[Zeppie2022]

Posted: 12/21/24 at 12:58pm

"One of the most devastating cuts was the Gabriella Miller Kids First Research Program, a bipartisan initiative supporting pediatric cancer research. Named after a 10-year-old girl who lost her life to an inoperable brain tumor, this program was stripped from the GOP’s version of the bill, alongside funding to help children on Medicaid access complex medical care across state lines. Nancy Goodman, founder of Kids v. Cancer, called it “a completely heart-wrenching outcome.”

You do know Joe Biden is still POTUS. Maybe he should have not approved of another 4.3 billion in forgiveness of student debt and worked to save this program.

[Zeppie2022]

Posted: 12/21/24 at 1:01pm

"I’m afraid so. It’s all just a game to these people, a sport. Real-life consequences for ordinary people are completely irrelevant to them."

Quick questions. Are you good with our national debt? If not, name me a few government programs you are ok with eliminating or reducing funding. 

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 12/21/24 at 3:57pm

I am happy to talk about loan forgiveness.

 

The $4.28 billion in student loan forgiveness under the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program reflects a targeted approach to reducing student debt for individuals in public service roles. This program rewards public servants who have consistently made qualifying payments and met eligibility requirements over ten years. It’s part of a broader strategy to address student debt burdens while navigating legal challenges that have limited more expansive debt relief efforts.

 

Since 2021, changes to the PSLF program have helped streamline the process, enabling over 1.06 million borrowers to benefit from loan forgiveness. This effort underscores the administration’s focus on supporting public service workers and addressing systemic issues within student loan repayment systems.

 

Who else had there loans forgiven lets look. During the implementation of the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), several companies linked to former President Donald Trump and his associates received substantial loans, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the equitable distribution of funds.

CloudCommerce, a digital marketing company associated with Brad Parscale, Trump’s former campaign manager, received a PPP loan of $780,680. Parscale, who had significant ties to the company, was scrutinized for benefiting from the program.
 

Phunware, a data firm employed by Trump’s 2020 campaign for voter outreach, secured a $6.1 million PPP loan. The company’s connections to the Trump campaign drew attention, especially given the substantial loan amount relative to typical PPP disbursements.

Ashford Hospitality Trust, a hotel group led by Monty Bennett, a prominent Trump donor, applied for $126 million in PPP loans and received $76 million before public scrutiny led to the return of these funds. The situation highlighted concerns about large firms with political connections accessing substantial relief funds intended for small businesses.

 

Other Notable Recipients Additional businesses with ties to Trump associates that received PPP loans include

 Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP: The law firm of Marc Kasowitz, one of Trump’s personal attorneys, received a loan between $5 million and $10 million.
 G.H. Palmer Associates: A real estate firm owned by Geoffrey Palmer, a significant donor to Trump’s campaigns, secured a loan ranging from $350,000 to $1 million.

 

The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program and Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) both aim to address economic challenges but serve different purposes. PSLF directly incentivizes public service by forgiving student debt for individuals working in essential roles such as education, healthcare, and public safety, ensuring long-term societal benefits. In contrast, PPP focused on providing short-term relief to businesses during the pandemic, with some funds raising concerns about equitable distribution and potential misuse. Supporting PSLF over PPP loan forgiveness prioritizes investment in public service professionals who contribute to societal well-being and ensures that financial relief directly aligns with long-term public benefit objectives.

And I also continue to support cancer research for children.

[Zeppie2022]

Posted: 12/21/24 at 4:56pm

"I am happy to talk about loan forgiveness."

I am too. How about being like my wife and I who saved money for years to ensure we could put our children through college without a student loan and start adult life without debt. Got a great idea for people, go to a community college for a couple of years and then transfer to another school, lot cheaper option. Maybe go to a trade school which is also less expensive and learn a skill which is better than some useless degree. While you are forgiving student debt to people what does that say to the people who actually did the right thing and paid off their debt. What kind of lesson are you teaching young people when you have government pay off their personal debt. Please tell me why my tax dollars and yours should be spent to pay off any student loan instead of things like rebuilding the infrastructure of this country for example.

Updated On: 12/21/24 at 04:56 PM

[Jay Lerner-Z]

Posted: 12/21/24 at 7:04pm

How was the national debt wracked up?

Military industrial complex, perhaps?

Maybe Trump will stop supplying Israel with the arsenal they use to slaughter innocent children. He does pride himself on being the “America First” “No Wars" guy.

 

Updated On: 12/21/24 at 07:04 PM

[Zeppie2022]

Posted: 12/21/24 at 8:05pm

"How was the national debt wracked up? Military industrial industry, perhaps?"

Bush(43) took us from surplus to debt and the major cause was two wars. I want a strong military as much as anybody, but nobody can tell me with a straight face that the military budget is not very bloated and can be cut. There are even very simple things to do like not giving foreign aid to countries that despise the US. How much do we supply in benefits for people here illegally? I can't imagine many government programs that could not survive a 1-2% budget cut.

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 12/22/24 at 1:21am

While you are forgiving PPP loans for millionaires and large corporations, what does that say to the small business owners who struggled to repay their loans or operated without financial assistance? What kind of lesson are you teaching businesses when the government forgives significant debts for the wealthiest entities? Please tell me why my tax dollars and yours should be spent to forgive PPP loans for multimillion-dollar corporations instead of being invested in critical needs like rebuilding the infrastructure of this country, for example.

 

Another critical factor in balancing the budget is ensuring a sustainable tax policy that generates sufficient revenue. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 made this much harder by significantly reducing corporate and individual tax rates. On the individual side, the law lowered tax rates across all brackets, nearly doubled the standard deduction, and capped state and local tax (SALT) deductions at $10,000, disproportionately benefiting higher-income earners while limiting deductions for residents of high-tax states. Although proponents argued that these cuts would boost economic growth, they largely shifted the burden of funding government programs without producing sufficient revenue offsets. Combined with a reduction in the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, these changes added an estimated $1.9 trillion to the deficit over a decade, further straining the ability to fund essential priorities like infrastructure and education.

 

Meanwhile, billionaires are paying less in taxes than ever before, both in percentage terms and in overall contributions relative to their wealth. Loopholes in the tax code, lower capital gains tax rates, and the reduced corporate tax rate allow many ultra-wealthy individuals and large corporations to minimize their tax liabilities. Recent studies have shown that some billionaires effectively pay a lower tax rate than middle-class Americans when factoring in capital gains and other tax advantages. This growing disparity in tax responsibility undermines fiscal equity, reduces government revenue, and makes it harder to address the national deficit or invest in critical public services. Closing these loopholes and ensuring that the wealthiest contribute their fair share is essential for a sustainable fiscal future.

You’ll say well Biden was president, but Congress controls the purse. Civics 101.

The tax code did not significantly change during the Biden administration due to several factors. First, congressional dynamics played a significant role. While President Biden proposed tax reforms to increase taxes on corporations and the wealthy, these changes required approval from Congress. The evenly divided Senate and narrow Democratic majority in the House during the early part of his term made passing comprehensive tax reform challenging. The Senate filibuster, requiring a 60-vote threshold for most legislation, further limited the ability to enact sweeping changes without bipartisan support. While budget reconciliation allowed some fiscal measures to pass with a simple majority, its scope was limited, and other priorities often took precedence.

 

Additionally, economic considerations influenced legislative priorities. With the economy facing challenges such as inflation, supply chain disruptions, and COVID-19 recovery efforts, some lawmakers were hesitant to raise taxes, fearing it could hinder economic growth during a fragile period. The administration also focused on other legislative priorities, such as infrastructure investments and pandemic relief packages, which competed with tax reform efforts.

 

Political realities further complicated the situation. Tax reforms targeting corporations and high-income individuals faced strong opposition from powerful lobbying groups and lawmakers aligned with business interests, delaying or blocking proposed changes. While the administration introduced measures to improve IRS enforcement and close some tax loopholes, structural changes to the tax code were constrained by these combined factors.

 

[Zeppie2022]

Posted: 12/22/24 at 11:31am

"While you are forgiving PPP loans for millionaires and large corporations, what does that say to the small business owners who struggled to repay their loans or operated without financial assistance? What kind of lesson are you teaching businesses when the government forgives significant debts for the wealthiest entities? Please tell me why my tax dollars and yours should be spent to forgive PPP loans for multimillion-dollar corporations instead of being invested in critical needs like rebuilding the infrastructure of this country, for example."

Two wrongs don't make a right, real simple.

"You’ll say well Biden was president, but Congress controls the purse. Civics 101."

No kidding. Tell me a POTUS that does not get involved with budget negotiations in Congress. Nice try -lol.

"Combined with a reduction in the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, these changes added an estimated $1.9 trillion to the deficit over a decade, further straining the ability to fund essential priorities like infrastructure and education."

Got a deal for you. I will raise the corporate rate to 28% if you agree to cut all government programs by 1-2%. Problem solved -lol.

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 12/22/24 at 11:56am

I see it differently.

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) (I won’t even call them. The Trump tax cuts, because Congress holds the purse ) made some big changes to tax policy, like cutting the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and lowering the top individual tax rate from 39.6% to 37%. It also doubled the estate tax exemption and added a 20% deduction for pass-through business income, which mostly helped high earners. Corporate tax cuts were made permanent, but the individual cuts will expire in 2025.

 

For context, corporate tax rates under Republican presidents like Reagan and Eisenhower were much higher—28% under Reagan after his reforms and as high as 52% under Eisenhower—yet the economy thrived.

 

The TCJA is projected to add around $2 trillion to the federal deficit over a decade, creating pressure to cut funding for essential programs like Social Security, Medicare, and veterans’ services. Discretionary funding for education, infrastructure, and scientific research is also at risk. Reductions in payroll tax revenue further strain the funding base for Social Security and Medicare.

I don’t see a need to cut critical programs that lift people out of poverty, especially when it’s clear that these tax cuts have significantly contributed to the deficit.

 

The biggest benefits of the tax cuts went to corporations, wealthy individuals, and high-income taxpayers, while middle- and lower-income taxpayers got smaller, temporary gains. The policy has widened income and wealth gaps, and when the individual tax cuts expire, many middle-income earners could face higher taxes. Historically, the U.S. has seen strong economic growth with higher corporate tax rates, so cutting vital programs to fix a deficit caused by tax breaks for the wealthy doesn’t make sense. Revisiting tax policies would better support fairness and long-term stability.

 

[Zeppie2022]

Posted: 12/22/24 at 8:13pm

"I see it differently. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) (I won’t even call them. The Trump tax cuts, because Congress holds the purse ) made some big changes to tax policy, like cutting the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and lowering the top individual tax rate from 39.6% to 37%. It also doubled the estate tax exemption and added a 20% deduction for pass-through business income, which mostly helped high earners. Corporate tax cuts were made permanent, but the individual cuts will expire in 2025."

So, do I. The liberal answer to everything is raise taxes and the rich are evil. Liberals for some reason believe every government program budget is lean and mean - OMG. Per the IRS, the top 1% of earners paid 40.4% of all federal income taxes in 2022. The funny thing to me when you bring up individual tax cuts is that the same people (Congress) who write the tax laws are the rich people you are annoyed about getting a tax break.

The other thing that drives me crazy is that you and others think that federal income tax is the only tax people pay. State income tax is also paid by almost everyone with few exceptions of states (Texas, Florida) that do not have one. The highest rate can be anywhere between 8-13% if you live in states like NY, NJ and California for example. So, if you are in the top tax rate for federal and states tax in one of those states almost 50% of your income is taken away due to government taxes. Just imagine if you could calculate all you pay in a year in taxes. You can pay federal and state tax. Some cities have their own tax. If you own a house, you pay property tax. Most things you buy you will pay a sales tax. If you buy gas for your car, the price has a tax included in it. It never seems to end -lol

One last thing. You love to cut and paste things from media sources on majority of your posts. My guess is that these sources are probably left leaning. You would get more "cred" from me about these things if you named the source. My gut feeling is you are not posting things from "Wall St Journal" or "Fox News" -lol

Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah or any other holiday you celebrate. I am "out" until 2025.

Updated On: 12/22/24 at 08:13 PM

[Jay Lerner-Z]

Posted: 12/22/24 at 9:45pm

Merry Christmas, Zep!

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 12/23/24 at 1:37am

As we head into the holiday season, it’s worth reflecting on the values of charity, critical thinking, and informed engagement. The holidays inspire generosity, but the needs in our communities don’t disappear after the decorations come down. Acts of kindness—whether donating, volunteering, or simply supporting others—are essential all year long.

Consistently practicing generosity builds stronger communities and fosters gratitude in our own lives. Equally important is carrying this same thoughtful approach to the information we consume and share. Real news sources, like The Wall Street Journal, Reuters, or The Associated Press, adhere to rigorous standards that help us engage in informed, meaningful discussions. Turning to sensationalized or biased outlets risks reinforcing echo chambers instead of fostering understanding. I’m happy to consider Wall Street Journal articles or other credible sources that might counterpoint my arguments—constructive dialogue depends on fact-based perspectives.

 

Finally, networks like Fox News remind us why this matters. By their own admission, much of their programming is entertainment, not journalism. While entertainment has its place, conflating it with news can mislead audiences and undermine informed debate. As we give back this season, let’s also commit to engaging critically with the world around us—carrying the spirit of charity, truth, and dialogue throughout the year.

 

and merry Christmas to all and to all a good night.

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 12/24/24 at 10:39am

Just in time for Christmas!

The recently released House Ethics Committee report on Matt Gaetz is jaw-dropping, but let’s be real—it feels like just the beginning. The report, written by a Republican-majority subcommittee, outlines some serious allegations against Gaetz, including statutory rape, prostitution, and drug use. It’s a deep dive into how power and privilege can be abused, featuring everything from payments for sex to shady drug requests and even a “customer appreciation week” (yes, really).

 

This isn’t just about one guy behaving badly. It’s about how these kinds of actions are often enabled by systems and networks that protect people in power. Gaetz’s ties to convicted sex trafficker Joel Greenberg highlight how far this web extends, and it’s unsettling to think about how many other stories like this could be out there.

 

The report’s release, despite Gaetz leaving Congress, shows how much public demand for accountability is growing. It’s a clear message: resigning doesn’t mean you get a free pass.

 

What’s even more striking is that this investigation wasn’t pushed by political opponents. A Republican-majority subcommittee spearheaded it, which makes the findings even harder to ignore. You can read the full report here.

 

This feels like a warning shot. With growing calls for transparency and accountability, don’t be surprised if more high-profile names find themselves under the microscope. It’s not just about Gaetz—it’s about a larger reckoning for how we deal with abuses of power. Buckle up, because this might just be the beginning.

[South Florida]

Posted: 12/30/24 at 11:15am

'Quick questions. Are you good with our national debt? If not, name me a few government programs you are ok with eliminating or reducing funding."

The National Debt? How did the Dumps do on that?

Let's gut offense spending.

You're clueless self is irritating.

 

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 12/31/24 at 8:02am

So, it looks like Trump is changing his tune on immigration—or at least on H-1B visas. In a recent interview with the New York Post, he called the program “great” and admitted he’s used it at his properties. This is a pretty big shift from his first term, when his administration tried (and failed) to implement stricter rules on these visas.
 

Meanwhile, MAGA world is imploding over the issue. Some, like Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, are defending the program, saying it helps the U.S. attract top talent (Musk even credited H-1B visas for why SpaceX and Tesla exist here). Musk didn’t hold back, calling critics “contemptible fools” and saying they’re hurting the GOP by clinging to outdated ideas.

 

On the flip side, people like Steve Bannon, Laura Loomer, and Nikki Haley argue that the program takes jobs from Americans. Haley called it “lazy” to rely on foreign workers and said companies need to invest in training the U.S. workforce.

What’s wild is that Musk’s support of the visas has sparked a whole side drama—some conservatives claim he’s censoring them on X (formerly Twitter) after they criticized him. Feels like another classic case of Trump stirring the pot and letting his allies duke it out.

Instead of defunding the Department of Education, we should be focusing on investing more resources into American workers and their future. A well-funded education system is essential for equipping Americans with the skills and knowledge they need to thrive in a competitive global economy. By strengthening vocational training, expanding access to higher education, and fostering lifelong learning opportunities, we can build a workforce capable of meeting the challenges of modern industries. Cutting funding only undermines our ability to innovate and leaves American workers at a disadvantage compared to countries that prioritize education and skill development. Investing in education isn’t just about students—it’s about securing a prosperous future for all Americans.

[Zeppie2022]

Posted: 1/1/25 at 5:31pm

"Merry Christmas, Zep!"

Thanks Jay, it was great Christmas and hope yours was the same. I really hoped you followed up on my advice and did some charitable giving/work.  Happy New Year!!!

[Zeppie2022]

Posted: 1/1/25 at 5:50pm

"The National Debt? How did the Dumps do on that? Let's gut offense spending. You're clueless self is irritating."

You are troll. It is a new year so I will overlook your typical juvenile insults one last time and respond to your post.

Actually, in terms of dollars Obama ran up more debt than Trump (7.6 trillion to 6.7 trillion). See link below. To be fair, Obama served 8 years and at this time Trump has only served 4 years. Let me continue to be fair and say Trump had to deal with effects of a worldwide pandemic which accounted for some of that debt. I will continue to be fair and say part of Biden's debt was also caused by pandemic. Trump can fully be judged on this issue when his 2nd term has been completed.

https://www.investopedia.com/us-debt-by-president-dollar-and-percentage-7371225

Do you have a reading comprehension problem? Where did I say to "gut" any government program? I said why not cut 1-2% off the budget of all programs including the military. Let's take the military spending for example. In 2024, they spent 841 billion dollars on defense. If you cut 2% of that spending it would be a cut of 16.82 billion dollars. That would still give them a budget of 825 billion dollars. I would think they could survive with that amount of money to defend the country. 

Back to the bowl games. Wanted to do a quick check of threads on BWW and now can ignore them for a while again.

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 1/6/25 at 2:58pm

Today, we remember and honor the brave officers who lost their lives in connection to the events of January 6th, 2021. These individuals stood on the front lines, defending our democracy and the values we hold dear, often at great personal cost. Their courage and dedication remind us of the profound sacrifices made to protect our freedoms. We honor their memory by saying their names:

• Brian Sicknick (42) – U.S. Capitol Police, who died of strokes the day after enduring the physical and emotional toll of the attack.

• Howard Liebengood (51) – U.S. Capitol Police, who died by suicide shortly after January 6th.

• Jeffrey Smith (35) – Metropolitan Police Department, who also died by suicide in the days following the attack.

• Kyle DeFreytag (26) – Metropolitan Police Department, who died by suicide in July 2021.

• Gunther Hashida (43) – Metropolitan Police Department, who died by suicide in August 2021.

These officers made the ultimate sacrifice in service to our nation. Their lives, bravery, and dedication will never be forgotten. We owe them more than our gratitude; we owe them accountability, justice, and a steadfast commitment to the democratic ideals they defended.
 

To their families and loved ones, we hold you in our hearts today and always. May we honor their memory by building a future where such sacrifices are never needed again.

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 1/7/25 at 10:43am

The recent reports about Trump hosting a secret party at Mar-a-Lago should have all of us paying attention. It wasn’t just any gathering—it was packed with key figures involved in efforts to overturn the 2020 election, like John Eastman, Michael Flynn, Jeffrey Clark, and Peter Navarro. Trump’s comments at the party were a major red flag. He openly praised Eastman for pressuring Pence and doubled down on the idea that the 2020 election was stolen. He even pointed out how “they changed the law” to block what they tried to do—almost as if justifying it. This wasn’t a public event; it was held quietly, without press or fanfare. That says a lot.

It feels like a statement—a roadmap for what could come in the next four years: Normalizing past actions: This party glorifies people and actions that challenged the democratic process.

Rewriting the narrative: Celebrating these figures sends a signal to his base that what happened in 2020-2021 was justified.

Foreshadowing future plans: This feels less like a party and more like a strategy meeting to signal loyalty and readiness for what’s next. Trump’s also already said he plans to pardon Capitol Rioters once he’s in office. Combined with this event, it’s hard not to see this as a glimpse of what the next few years might hold.

Updated On: 1/7/25 at 10:43 AM

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 1/9/25 at 7:22am

My heart goes out to all those being impacted by the devasting wildfires in Southern California. Doug and I are praying for our fellow Californians who have evacuated, and we are thinking of the families whose homes, businesses, and schools remain in harm’s way. We are deeply grateful for the heroic first responders who are risking their own safety to fight the flames and help keep communities safe. I was briefed earlier tonight and will continue to receive regular updates about these damaging wildfires and the coordinated efforts to contain them.

I am also urging residents in the affected areas to listen to local officials, remain vigilant, and evacuate immediately if told to do so. President Biden and I are committed to ensuring that no community has to respond to this disaster alone. We have already mobilized federal resources to help suppress the fires, provide overhead support, and begin assisting those impacted. FEMA also quickly approved a Fire Management Assistance Grant to help reimburse the state for immediate firefighting costs.

As a proud daughter of California, I know the damage that wildfires have on our neighbors and communities. I also know that the impact is often felt long after the fire is contained. As we respond and as Californians recover, I will ensure that our administration is in constant contact with state and local officials.

Vice President Kamal Harris 2025

Meanwhile... 

The incoming Trump administration is making waves with some pretty wild foreign policy ideas—like using military force to retake the Panama Canal and putting economic pressure on Denmark to buy Greenland. Trump’s reasoning? “Economic security.” He’s also claiming that China is running the Panama Canal and hinting at turning Canada into the 51st state.

It kind of feels like we’re ignoring some really big problems at home to chase these big-ticket global ambitions. Sure, it’s great to want a stronger America, but maybe we should get our own house in order first? This mix of foreign goals and unresolved domestic struggles leaves a lot of people wondering where the focus really should be.

 

[Zeppie2022]

Posted: 1/9/25 at 5:26pm

"It kind of feels like we’re ignoring some really big problems at home to chase these big-ticket global ambitions. Sure, it’s great to want a stronger America, but maybe we should get our own house in order first? This mix of foreign goals and unresolved domestic struggles leaves a lot of people wondering where the focus really should be.

Really, see link below from a very liberal network -lol. Seems like they are ready to get things done for the American people. It may not be what you like, and it will hard get passed due to slim majority in the House and Senate. Looks like the "Laken Riley Act" will get passed which is something Trump advocated during the campaign.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/06/politics/trump-capitol-hill-republican-agenda/index.html

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 1/9/25 at 8:37pm

If they’re going to pass the  Laken Riley Act, they should also commit to robust disaster relief funding and continue to expand and invest in a clean energy economy. We need solutions that not only address the immediate aftermath of climate disasters like the one unfolding in California but also work toward mitigating future crises.

 

Building a cleaner, more sustainable energy infrastructure is critical to lessening the devastating effects of climate-related events. Let’s ensure that legislative actions reflect long-term vision and responsibility.