Papa John's Pizza Obamacare Hypocrisy — Page 3
Posted: 11/11/12 at 5:19pm
I could give you an answer but your biased mind would not accept it.You are a troll. You ask questions and demand answers. When posters give you the answers, you scream and deny it because they are not the answers you want to hear.If I honestly thought you were sincere and that we could engage in a discussion so I could see where you were coming from and vice versa then I would like that. However, you can not be trusted. You have lied. You have gone by other screen names.Others here have answered your questions better than I could have and you still refuse to believe it. Reginald has been more than patient with you and given you you honest thoughtful answers yet you reject them on all counts.
Honestly. What could I say to you? You are biased and keep trolling around here because EVERYONE else is wrong and you are the only one who is right. If I were posting somewhere and NO ONE AGREED WITH ME ON ANYTHING I would pack it in. If I went to Brietbart or Free Republic and began posting pro Obama threads and discovered no one agreed with me on ANYTHING I would have enough sense to realize that I am wasting my time.
Hey, it's a free country. Post away. You have a right to voice your opinions. However, you are wrong and you are not gonna find anyone here who agrees with you. You are not gonna sway someone to your way of thinking. Some would say you have too much time on your hand,after all what sane person would try so hard to convert a group onto thinking your way? Your party hates gay people and most here are gay.
So, if I don't answer your dumb questions that have probably been answered here before it's not that I can't. It's just that I have nothing to gain by it.You simply can not be taught.
Posted: 11/11/12 at 5:19pm
I'd love for Barbara Ehrenreich to update her classic "Nickel and Dimed" in light of all this.
Posted: 11/11/12 at 5:19pm
Another good reason why a single-payer system is needed.
Posted: 11/11/12 at 5:19pm
However it's a very competitive industry and most companies are conservative, so instead of the parent company changing prices, the franchisees are going to have to eat it internally.
I don't blame them for being conservative but it would be nice if they took a risk. However for all I know, they may have a study saying raising their price by 14 cents could lead to huge losses.
Posted: 11/11/12 at 5:21pm
That, as I understand it, is the crux of this debate, the distinction between the two political parties, and the source of all the enmity and bad feeling that colors these "discussions".
I believe--and I think that the Democratic party "believes"--that the Federal government has a role in encouraging employers to conform to a model that reflects MY school of thought,whereas the Republicans believe that this kind of legislation is an express lane to the Apocalypse--and not the good, Christian Apocalypse, but the bad, scary one in which the 1% are forced to part with some of their money.
They think I'm an Evil, un-American Marxist and I think they are reprehensibly selfish, greedy, short-sighted and evil.
And thus the name-calling.
Posted: 11/11/12 at 5:23pm
You make Mark Cuban seem cuddly.
Posted: 11/11/12 at 5:27pm
Mark Cuban IS cuddly.
Updated On: 11/11/12 at 05:27 PM
Posted: 11/11/12 at 5:27pm
That said, you're certainly entitled to feel that the government has a responsibility to encourage businesses to conform. And I staunchly disagree, because I feel everyone should be entitled to follow their own school of thought. Even though I agree with yours, I believe it's a breach of liberty to force others to. That said, I'm not sure there's much more left for us to personally debate because we just disagree on fundamentals of how we should be governed. And I think that's fine and I respect you having an opinion.
We had an educated discourse though, unlike others here who just have misdirected anger and don't understand how business or the economy works.
Updated On: 11/11/12 at 05:27 PM
Posted: 11/11/12 at 5:32pm
We need a system that is all inclusive of everyone. And the great thing about our capitalism system, is that in theory an employee can deny working for an employer if they don't provide good enough compensation such as health care. And instead said employee will find for and work for an employer who does. In reality, this doesn't exactly happen. But to a large extent it does and that's why unions exist. That's another big, complicated topic though.
Posted: 11/11/12 at 5:53pm
It doesn't matter whose face is there, they are all the same. I just find it amazing that you are spending so much time trying to make it sound like companies care about their employees.
Posted: 11/11/12 at 6:01pm
Julia Stewart, the CEO of DineEquity (which owns Applebee's) controls over 2,000 locations worldwide. She hasn't said anything. So it's actually completely different and it does matter whose face is on the poster.
You can't sum up the views of a multinational corporation based on one minority franchise owner.
Now can we go back to educating ourselves instead of generalizing topics and assigning blame wherever we can?
Updated On: 11/11/12 at 06:01 PM
Posted: 11/11/12 at 6:02pm
Posted: 11/11/12 at 6:03pm
Posted: 11/11/12 at 6:29pm
The ACA doesn't fully go into effect for a few more months, does it not? And President Obama has said that it'll change overtime too. I don't see the point of arguing about it, since it sounds like only one person here will be affected. (In this small business having to pay more to take care of their employees part anyway.)
Addison, if you're already doing more than the law requires, will this affect your bottom line at all?
Posted: 11/11/12 at 6:36pm
"The leadership in the Republican Party and the leadership in the conservative movement has to pull back, let people float new ideas. Let's have a serious debate. Don’t scream and yell when one person says, 'You know what? It won’t kill the country if we raise taxes a little bit on millionaires.' It really won't, I don’t think."
Don't fall on your own sword protecting the millionaires
Updated On: 11/11/12 at 06:36 PM
Posted: 11/11/12 at 6:38pm
Or is it the real struggling middle class schmoe we're worried about? Cause they probably don't have the multiple franchises that would boost them into the danger zone for this law.
It seems we are hearing them described as both, depending on which description will work in the argument of the moment. So which are they...regular middle class guys who own one or two franchises and won't be effected? Or wealthy guys who own enough franchises to be effected, but can afford the expense?
Posted: 11/11/12 at 6:43pm
If you own 20+ then you can definitely afford the dimes and nickles per employee.
Posted: 11/11/12 at 6:43pm
I have a real, fact based opinion. I don't make over generalizations and I don't attack anyone personally. Instead I point out the many flaws in your statements and silly inaccuracies (such as painting a small franchise owner as the CEO and voice of a huge multinational corporation).
Posted: 11/11/12 at 6:45pm
Posted: 11/11/12 at 6:49pm
Though you can have three or four locations with 50+ employees and still be middle class.
For the bigger guys, this will obviously still have an effect. Will it kill them? Probably not. Do they want to uphold their profits and lifestyle and not compromise? Most of the time, likely. Is there anything wrong with that? I don't see why not.
It's not their job to provide health insurance. If an employee doesn't like it, don't work for them. If enough employees don't like it and enough consumers stop spending money with them, things will change.
But that's what's great about capitalism. It's actually a fair system. No matter how much people want to yell and scream, if they have a minority point of view, they will stay a minority. If a vast majority of people feel this way then their wallets will speak for themselves and create change.
Posted: 11/11/12 at 6:54pm
ETA: I just read that surgeries for transgendered men and women are now covered under Healthy SF.
Updated On: 11/11/12 at 06:54 PM
Posted: 11/11/12 at 7:04pm
Posted: 11/11/12 at 7:07pm
So you'll have to excuse me for not continuing the conversation with someone who obviously has a hidden agenda.
BroadwayWorld TV