Chloe, I wasn't going to post to disagree with you before, but now that you've mentioned it again, I'll put in my two cents.

First of all, from a fan's perspective, of course it would be wonderful to see more publicity for their return and have anyone who might be interested in seeing them informed as to their return. However, from a business perspective, I don't think you can simplify it quite to the extent that you have.
Frankly, it sounds like the woman in your story missed the news mainly due to chance and misfortune rather than a lack of advertising. The news of their return has certainly spread enough within the musical theatre community that her husband has to know; it's just unfortunate that her husband didn't think to mention it to her. Anyway, even if the current advertising
hasn't been far-reaching enough to inform her about their return, advertising isn't about making sure that every last person who might be interested in something is aware of whatever you're trying to advertise. In fact, as you might know, the costs of informing every last person about something rise as the percentage of people you're reaching rises. For example, it might cost $10/person to reach 75% of your target audience, but as you try to push your percentage to 80%, it starts to cost $15/person and so on. It all comes down to cost/benefit analysis, and unfortunately, that means that the producers might lose the business of some people who would go to the show if they were better informed (but in actuality, save money because the additional advertising would cost them more than it's worth).
Currently, Rent is selling to, what, 98-100% capacity? If fewer and fewer people start showing up, by all means, advertise more, but just because every last person isn't informed about their return doesn't necessarily mean more advertising is required.
Updated On: 8/24/07 at 01:11 PM