I would have no problem speaking directly to her about how this unprofessional PR campaign of sending you out to shill while offering nothing more than "YOU CAN BELIEVE ME OR NOT!" as your "proof," provided she's interested in hearing my opinion. She hasn't seemed very compelled to reply to my emails in the past. What I don't understand is why this is even a necessary tactic with regard to information coming from someone who's official? I can't for anything come up with reasoning for why she feels she shouldn't be forthcoming about who she is, and in tandem, where this information is coming from. Why does its source, if it's official, have to be such a big secret? I know I'll get no answers from her minions, but it really just doesn't make ANY sense to me.
Suchandsuch@gmail.com sounds like the addresses that get made up to promote school theater productions and stuff, when people can't or don't want to spend the money for a domain. It doesn't have any air of being official.
And agreed, skittles. There need to be PEOPLE. Representatives. And like I said before, why this woman is not forthcoming about her representation of him is just... weird to the point of being rather suspect. It comes off as disorganized and unprofessional when, like you pointed out, there should be something like "contact ___ at ___@whatever.com," not this completely anonymous, ambiguous thing.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 11/21/07 at 09:28 PM
.jpg?format=auto&width=365)
