The Official Adam Pascal Love Thread, part 14, version 2.0 — Page 114

HA! I agree,I know there is alot of drama that I cant really follow about all of this, but it is cool that there is finally a site, although it is in need of better pictures as well

---

I think my favorite, however, is the picture on the roof. That body language combined with the head-on smoldering stare...YIKES!

---

I like the one on the roof, but I hate the angle that they are all taken at, and why is Larry always behind Adam in some spooky way like they are advertisisng a gay stalker movie?


eta - dont hide cat welcome!

---

Updated On: 11/27/07 at 02:06 AM

No it doesn't.

word2: you think Larry looks like TILLIE from Asbury Park????
HAHAHA HAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA

That is the FUNNIEST thing I have heard in a LONG time.

I completely agree on all of that, of course. I also feel like the content itself is going to seem more paltry with a little more perspective.

I don't think they've even evolved to that level yet.

Nope. Web-based template, even!

I LOATHE embedded music players.

Agreed. I mean, they're slightly more appropriate on an official site than anywhere else, but they're irritating and usually cause me to end up disliking the first few chords of whatever song is the default after a few months.

Updated On: 11/27/07 at 04:14 AM

I did notice that in the biography it said this: "Adam’s latest project, a yet-to-be-titled CD to be released in early 2008 is collaboration with writing partner Larry Edoff." So it's not Me and Larry...but their "band" apparently is.

---

OMG!!! Those photo shoot shots were just too much for a person at 7:30AM! The shirt and jeans, not that big of a deal, but sandal things?????? I hope I can give the site a better look later on.

---

What a thing to wake up to! I don't think it's horrible, but it's not great either. I guess I'm gonna stop complaining and take what I can get. I'm not feeling those new pictures at all. Who let him wear those sandals?

I especially love the blurry picture that was posted in the photo gallery. (And that tambourine one, too, in the bio.)

Also, I'd like to suggest that everyone post your criticisms of the site either there or on Adam's myspace. He should know that the design and pictures need to be better. It's a shame, given how great he was looking at the Nederlander this summer, that so many are unflattering.

ETA: Just looked at the bio, and a couple of corrections need to be made. The picture for "in movies" is from Broadway, and he tried out for Rent in 1995, not 1996. Cold Case needs a better picture too.

Updated On: 11/27/07 at 08:44 AM

See, but why does it have to be Adam Pascal Music? Why are we pretending his career only has this one component to it? I've been saying for years that what he needs is ONE official website that deals with all of his work, and lays everything out in one place. Because for the longest time, all he had was the Sh-k-Boom page, and that didn't carry much information, even though it was his official site. When I talked about an all-Adam official website, this was absolutely not at all remotely like what I envisioned. Whether the powers that be like it or not, this is where he's gained his fans. Because of Rent, this is probably where he will continue to gain them. And if someone who claims she knows what's best for him thinks that means pretending it doesn't exist, then I even further question her capabilities.

Glad she could get the biographical information straight. Nice job, Ilana. Nice. It's not like she's telling his E! True Hollywood story, for God's sake. She's messing up basic, publicly availably information. Not to mention that it looks like a web version of a picture book.

He listened and had someone crank a quick site out? After how many years? He's been needing an official website for way more than the three months that he was back in Rent. Cranking a quick site out at this point is not something to be proud of -- this is something he's needed for a long, long time; it's not as though the need just randomly popped up this summer and someone got right on the job. And no, it should never have been set live looking like that, I'm sorry. I can excuse a simplistic aesthetic while things are still getting up and running, I really can. But blatant mistakes? No. I'm sorry.

The whole thing is sad and disheartening and frankly, just f*cking pisses me off. He deserves better, and not something that looks like the web design of 1998.

I do think the video is one of the funniest things I've ever seen, though.

---

Updated On: 11/27/07 at 10:29 AM

Yeah, that'll fix the problem.

---