It's totally unrealistic. I'm just a total sap. I want them to be hopelessly in love, and the AIDS to be a sad, unfortunate accident, but in this situation that's just the type of thing that a lot of people condemn RENT for - for taking it all too lightly, and NOT making it real enough.
I also halfway agree about the way Roger looks in coherence with who got who into drugs. They're certainly not putting him out there as the picture of innocence. For some reason, I always had it in my head that Roger got it from drugs and gave it to April when they had sex. Before I saw the way April's going to look in the movie, for some reason, I sort of pictured her kind of spunky and innocent... just a girl who was in love with a guy. Even though Roger reacts negatively to Mimi being on drugs, I still feel like he could've gotten himself into it, and that he reacts that way to Mimi because of the way it ended up hurting him so badly.
I'm usually not a speculator, but RENT has always been one of those things about which I love to do it. Larson wrote such rich characters, and they're some of the only characters in anything that I've ever truly been able to view as pictures and representations of real people. Even if you don't know exactly what their roots are, you can feel a history that feels real, and even though you don't know everything about their stories, you wish you did. They're characters whose stories don't feel like they start and end when they play does; you just care too much for them.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 4/2/05 at 07:26 PM