Skip to main content
Shop Merch Add a Show Listing
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

#2

Who The #@#k Is Saul Alinsky?

I watched that three times last night. I'm glad he answered that question!
#4

Who The #@#k Is Saul Alinsky?

Was anyone else annoyed with Kennedy? Was too bad Martin Bashir could not get a word in.


'There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently' -Robert Evans-

Updated On: 1/28/12 at 04:47 PM

#5

Who The #@#k Is Saul Alinsky?

It was a bizarre episode. I was annoyed that Bashir just sat there, I wanted him to tell those two to shut the hell up.
#6

Who The #@#k Is Saul Alinsky?

After my initial shock at suddenly remembering I once knew what a Kennedy was, I have to say I thought she looked great. She seems more libertarian than Republican, and yes, I still found her deeply annoying, much like I did when she was on MTV.

But Bill's constant refuting Sr.Rohrabacher's nonsense with facts was great.
#7

Who The #@#k Is Saul Alinsky?

Anyone who thinks they are going to learn ANYTHING from watching Bill Maher needs a brain transplant. For Maher to sit there on national TV and say that Saul Alinsky is some civil rights activist who fought for the rights of black people and is otherwise an "unknown" is simply ridiculous. Alinsky is best known (and still a HUGE influence today) because of a book he wrote called RULES FOR RADICALS (didn't hear Maher mention that at all, did you?). Some of the tactics he wrote about included:

*A "fart-in" wherein a large number of African Americans "won" a free dinner and a night out at the opera or ballet. The dinner would consist largely of baked beans and other gas-promoting foods so the white, rich establishment at the opera/ballet would have to sit in a theater amongst a large group of people who were passing gas.
*A "piss-in" wherein he encouraged African Americans to use the urinals and toilets in public places and not let others use them.

Alinsky is considered the king of community organizers and the idea that Obama has never heard of him or never read his book is asinine.
Maher also did not mention that Alinsky was a Communist/Marxist and that his book is still HUGELY popular today (currently number 59 in Books at Amazon with over 180 reviews). So the idea that the radical left don't know this guys is completely dishonest. But then, Maher counts on the ignorance of his audience, and it looks as if that ignorance is plenty strong!
#9

Who The #@#k Is Saul Alinsky?

Wow, Jordan! It is certainly hard to argue with your intelligent, well thought out response to my post. I had no idea I was dealing with such educated people here. Nice to know.

Updated On: 1/29/12 at 01:01 PM

#10

Who The #@#k Is Saul Alinsky?

Well now that you know, I assume you have no reason for sticking around here.
#12

Who The #@#k Is Saul Alinsky?

I already know how to tie my shoes and from what you've shown, I doubt you have much more knowledge to offer the world.
#13

Who The #@#k Is Saul Alinsky?

I wager that anyone who reads this thread is going to learn more from my post re: Saul Alinsky than they are going to learn from Bill Maher's snarky comments. I think that is why your response was so, oh I don't know, ANGRY????
LOL!
#14

WOW! A Real Troll Talking About #@&* He knows NOTHING About!

Miky, I agree with Jordan.STFU! Bill Maher is great. He is right on the money with why liberals hate GW Bush and he has been right about other things. If you think Bill is snarky, fine. Great. IMO He is honest and tells it like it is and is funny while doing so.You are the one who is angry, NOT Jordan. Loved where you said 'you can learn more from a guy like me abou ALinsky than Bill Maher'. Sounds like something Newt Gingrich would say. Another blowhard who knows more than any of us here at BWW.I am a liberal and I never heard of Saul Alinksy nor had any of my other liberal friends or few conservative friends, so your arrogant ramblings are wrong there. Also, your biased commentary on who the guy is was also rather disturbing. A 'Fart in?' A 'Piss in?' I looked it up on Google and found those claims ONLY on anti liberal websites. Nothing factual to back that up. Some of the things you said in your post were very similar to rantings on websites like Newsmax,worldnetdaily,and newsbusters,not to mention a few others.

You make it sound like a community organizer is a bad thing (Alinsky was the 'King of Community Organizers') right there you already have this hatred towards any type of community organization. Who said Obama never heard of him? Not Bill Maher? Perhaps the racist voices chanting in your tiny pea sized hateful brain!

Communist/Marxist? Oh Jee's! You are angry that Bill Maher did not give the audience in 5 minutes a full lifetime size biography of the man, oh and 'your kind' Mikey think most liberals who like Obama are communist/Marxist/socialist,right?


Nothing of what you 'preached' is mentioned here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saul_Alinsky

Of course, they don't put in their personal and prejudice commentary while giving you the facts either.

Sometimes its not worth engaging in a conversation with someone. After reading your hateful disgusting post, I can see why Jordan said what he did. I would have said far worse.You bring nothing to the debate accept the desire to remind everyone you are the smartest guy in the room and if no one listens to you then they are dumb.You also bring hate and ignorance to the table. No debate with you, just your view of 'how things are'. 'Agree with me or you are a moron.'I read that in other posts of yours as well. You could learn a thing or two from Bill Maher and Saul Alinsky. Troll somewhere else.








'There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently' -Robert Evans-

Updated On: 1/29/12 at 03:08 PM

#15

WOW! A Real Troll Talking About #@&* He knows NOTHING About!

Oh dear, where to begin???? I will try to do this in a kind way, as I hate to make people cry.

Let's start at the very beginning.
"You are the one who is angry, NOT Jordan."

Jordan (and YOU) both used foul language when addressing a post to me and told me to "shut up". Neither of you effectively negated nor challenged ANY of the facts within my initial post. Show me where any of my posts in this thread show anger. I am not angry as I sit here and type. I am smiling!! I have a big grin across my face; there is a great deal of satisfaction in knowing that I am right, and that I am dealing with small-minded people who cannot win a debate against me on the merits of their argument or on the FACTS, and therefore have to resort to petty, childish responses.
Therefore your and Jordan FAIL in the "not angry" department.

"Loved where you said 'you can learn more from a guy like me abou ALinsky than Bill Maher'. Sounds like something Newt Gingrich would say."

Maybe. Let's see, who told you more about Alinsky, Bill Maher or me??
Did Maher tell you that Alinsky wrote a book? NOPE! Did he tell you the name of the book? NOPE! Did Maher mention the popularity of Alinsky's book with those on the left? NOPE!! Did he mention how odd it was for a book written in the early 70s to still be in publication, to be in the top 60 book sales on Amazon, and to have over 180 reviews on Amazon? NOPE!! Did he mention any of the tactics Alinsky used, like I did? NOPE!! Did Maher mention that Alinsky was affiliated with the Communist Party and was a supporter of the philosophy of Karl Marx? NOPE!!!!
The main idea behind Maher's rant was that Alinsky was a nobody that no one has ever heard of. Yet, I blew that claim right out of the water, didn't I?? Maher is COUNTING on your ignorance. And it appears that he has nothing to worry about.

"I am a liberal and I never heard of Saul Alinksy"

Surprise, Surprise!! Using your post here as a guide, I would not put you in the realm of the "well read".

"A 'Fart in?' A 'Piss in?' I looked it up on Google and found those claims ONLY on anti liberal websites."

Uhhhhhh, you might want to READ the wiki link you posted. Pay REALLY close attention to the paragraph that begins "Alinsky's tactics were often unorthodox". They mention the "fart-in" and the "Piss-in" right there on the link you provided!!

"Nothing of what you 'preached' is mentioned here."

See above ^^^^

'After reading your hateful disgusting post, I can see why Jordan said what he did."

Please specify what part of my post was "hateful disgusting".

"Sometimes its not worth engaging in a conversation with someone."

Agreed!

Just out of curiosity, what grade are you in??




Updated On: 1/29/12 at 05:23 PM

#17

WOW! A Real Troll Talking About #@&* He knows NOTHING About!

The notion that it's some sort of Democrat bible is just silly. Renewed interest in the book began, really, when it became associated with Obama during the election. The spike in its rank now is because of Gingrich, Maher, et al.

I didn't read them all, of course, but at a glance most of the Amazon reviews seem to be from spooked right-wingers. Which is odd, considering that the Tea Party makes use of what Alinsky talks about.

Maher didn't mention Alinsky's affiliation with the Communist party probably because he didn't have one: When asked during an interview whether he ever considered becoming a Communist party member, he replied: 'Not at any time. I've never joined any organizationnot even the ones I've organized myself. I prize my own independence too much. And philosophically, I could never accept any rigid dogma or ideology, whether it's Christianity or Marxism.'"
#19

WOW! A Real Troll Talking About #@&* He knows NOTHING About!

Darling, you couldn't make me cry but I find it adorable that you think so high of yourself!

Leave Jordan out of this. I've read posts of his in the past and Mikey, he is way out of your league.Stick with me. FOCUS! The reason I did not give you any respect was because frankly, you don't deserve it.Most people just won't waste their time when confronted with such ignorance.Perhaps I was mistaken your arrogance for anger.I can never tell with 'people like you'. I am also smiling sweetie, so we are both a couple of merry gay guys.To come to BWW and call us small minded people because we don't agree with you is what I call being arrogant. I do not agree with Papalovesmambo but I have nothing but respect for him.

You talk about winning debates. Well, typical right wing ideology here. Engaging in debates is suppose to educate,not show off how smart you are. You sound like an insecure A-hole who needs to feel smart (which I am sure is not far from the truth) SO, cry victory is your arrogant hateful little head and go on thinking Jordan and I are idiots(Yeah, your are going to fit in just fine here)

Actually, I had heard of Alinsky from Newt Gingrich.However, the right has been talking about him more than the left. Glen Beck has said some of the exact same thing you have about Alinsky. This coming from a guy who thinks he "has the facts" .


Adam Brandon, a spokesman for the conservative non-profit organization FreedomWorks, which is one of several groups involved in organizing Tea Party protests, says the group gives Alinsky's Rules for Radicals to it's top leadership members. A shortened guide called Rules for Patriots is distributed to its entire network. In a January 2012 story that appeared in The Wall Street Journal, citing the organization's tactic of sending activists to town hall meetings, Brandon explained, 'his tactics when it comes to grass roots organizing are incredibly effective.' Former Republican House Majority Leader Dick Armey also gives copies of Alinsky's book Rules for Radicals to Tea Party leaders.

Gee Mikey, you failed to leave that part out of your sermon. You love telling us about how certain people 'rely on the ignorance of liberals'. You use this a lot. I noticed it when reading your hilarious but false claims on the Mitt Romney's 13.9 Tax Rate Thread.So, it sounds like you like to cater the so called facts to your advantage. Leave this part out here. Embelish this one here and so on. FACT IS, you are NOT the smartest guy in the room. Far from it from what I and others can see.But keep telling yourself that.

Oh, and so you know. I am still smiling. Still calm. Not angry.

People like Mikey believes Saul Alinsky is the architect of every action Obama or the left takes. The right believes that Obama follows Alinsky to the letter and that everybody on the left studies Alinsky.The right has lots of quotes they claim come from Alinsky advocating shocking tactics. They believe there is a plot to create complete disorder and a breakdown of society to make way for a new communist order that enslaves humanity.

I discovered The Republicans pushed the Alinsky meme in 2008.Not as much as the William Ayers and Reverand Wright but it was there. My guess is Mikey is a Glen Beck fan who gets his news and 'facts' from Fox. Your hatred towards community organizers is very telling. Do you really see what they do as being something bad? Really? You would discourage a teenager from becoming a community organizer?

I did get a PM from someone here. I thank you for keeping this thread bumped. Most people would not have seen it were it not for you. Seems like it was not me or Jordan but Bill Maher that 'set you off'. I have read posts here from people who don't like him but yours is very telling. Almost personal.A vendetta against Bill, his fans and anyone who finds him funny or just agrees with him.Darling, keep telling yourself you are not angry and that you are a very smart person. OBVIOUSLY, we struck a nerve with you. LOL


'There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently' -Robert Evans-

Updated On: 1/29/12 at 05:56 PM

#20

WOW! A Real Troll Talking About #@&* He knows NOTHING About!

I confess I'd never heard the fart-in notion before, but I like it!

From a PLAYBOY interview:

ALINSKY: Another idea I had that almost came to fruition was directed at the Rochester Philharmonic, which was the establishment's -- and Kodak's -- cultural jewel. I suggested we pick a night when the music would be relatively quiet and buy 100 seats. The 100 blacks scheduled to attend the concert would then be treated to a preshow banquet in the community consisting of nothing but huge portions of baked beans. Can you imagine the inevitable consequences within the symphony hall? The concert would be over before the first movement -- another Freudian slip -- and Rochester would be immortalized as the site of the world's first fart-in.

PLAYBOY: Aren't such tactics a bit juvenile and frivolous?

ALINSKY: I'd call them absurd rather than juvenile. But isn't much of life kind of a theater of the absurd? As far as being frivolous is concerned, I say if a tactic works, it's not frivolous. Let's take a closer look at this particular tactic and see what purposes it serves -- apart from being fun. First of all, the fart-in would be completely outside the city fathers' experience. Demonstrations, confrontations and picketings they'd learned to cope with, but never in their wildest dreams could they envision a flatulent blitzkrieg on their sacred symphony orchestra. It would throw them into complete disarray. Second, the action would make a mockery of the law, because although you could be arrested for throwing a stink bomb, there's no law on the books against natural bodily functions. Can you imagine a guy being tried in court on charges of first-degree farting? The cops would be paralyzed. Third, when the news got around, everybody who heard it would break out laughing, and the Rochester Philharmonic and the establishment it represents would be rendered totally ridiculous. A fourth benefit of the tactic is that it's psychically as well as physically satisfying to the participants. What oppressed person doesn't want, literally or figuratively, to **** on his oppressors? Here was the closest chance they'd have. Such tactics aren't just cute; they can be useful in driving your opponent up the wall. Very often the most ridiculous tactic can prove the most effective.

#21

WOW! A Real Troll Talking About #@&* He knows NOTHING About!

Why is Saul Alinski, in whatever tenuous ties people can dig up between him and Obama, so much more frightening than John Hagee, Cindy Jacobs, Rod Parsley, Peter LaBarbera, Pat Robertson and these other fringe figures who are not only a very real presence in politics today but people whom three of the four remaining GOP candidates proudly court?
#23

WOW! A Real Troll Talking About #@&* He knows NOTHING About!

Calvin, ask Mikey that question.It's a fair and honest question. I doubt Mr. 'I am smarter than You' will have an answer for you. However, be prepared to be labeled a Marxist/Anti American/Socialist of you do.He will also remind you how dumb you are (not to worry,you are in good company) and how smart he is. I think Mikey would fit in better over at FreeRepublic.com (if he is not already a member there that is)


'There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently' -Robert Evans-

Updated On: 1/29/12 at 06:36 PM

#24

WOW! A Real Troll Talking About #@&* He knows NOTHING About!

True, Alinsky was never a "card carrying member" of the Communist Party. He was much too smart for that.
However, his affiliation with the Communist Party and his sympathies for the movement are well documented.
From the Encyclopedia of Chicago: "In the 1930s, the Communist Party in Chicago reached its largest audience through organizing the unemployed and protesting evictions and cuts in relief. Black Belt organizers recruited protesters at Washington Park, while Communists in Back of the Yards built alliances with community activists like Roman Catholic bishop Bernard Sheil and Saul Alinsky."

BTW, why didn't Maher mention Alinsky's book, Rules For Radicals? It is his primary claim to fame. After all, Hillary Clinton's thesis paper used the book extensively (perhaps why she tried to suppress her thesis for so many years).

Saul Alinsky (1909-1972) was one of the nation’s foremost community organizers, publishing several books and creating organizations which continue today. He gave a wide ranging Playboy Magazine interview shortly before his death. In it he gives a detailed description of his 1930s life as a communist fellow-traveler.

Alinsky told Playboy, “I knew plenty of Communists in those days, and I worked with them on a number of projects. Back in the Thirties, the Communists did a hell of a lot of good work."



Updated On: 1/29/12 at 06:43 PM

#25

WOW! A Real Troll Talking About #@&* He knows NOTHING About!

Well, it sounds like he was a hell of a lot smarter than you.

Again, why are you SO OBSESSED WITH BILL MAHER? You are angry that he did not sum up his entire biography in 5 minutes. Why should he mention this book? He said he had never heard of him before last week.(did you watch the video)

SO, you HATE, and I mean HATE COMMUNIST! Yeah, we get that. Sounds like you also hate Atheists.

Now,Answer Calvin's question.


'There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently' -Robert Evans-

Updated On: 1/29/12 at 06:50 PM

BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $58
Hot Show
Tickets From $106
Hot Show
Tickets From $71