#26
Posted: 4/5/12 at 2:05pm
Yes, I'm referring to both the Marriott theatre and the hotel. It's a terrible piece of architecture. You step into it, and you could be in any Marriott in the world. Almost no aspect of it has any relation to New York or Broadway. It's a soulless, sterile concrete fortress.
For those who were born and grew up in the 80s and 90s and never saw the old Times Square, there are certain aspects that have been lost forever. There were a small handful of skyscrapers, but most of the district had very small scale, odd three and four story buildings. Light to the street was not as blocked as it is now, with the many skyscrapers that line Broadway and Seventh Avenue. Allowances were made to slap a couple of jaunty signs on the shins and ankles of these new buildings, but they still create the feeling of a shadowy canyon for pedestrians walking Times Square. It all looks very "Blade Runner" these days. But New York is ever changing (for better or worse) and one has to accept that things you love about it may not still be there 10, 20 or 30 years from now.
As much as the new Times Square is a safer, cleaner place to be and the theatre industry seems more robust than at the various low points of the 70s and mid 80s, I do miss the energy that the old Times Square had, and the rush of nervousness and excitement I used to feel walking the streets of Times Square. The only thing like it these days is San Francisco's Tenderloin - although there, I feared for my life in ways I never did in the heyday of "bad old Times Square".
For those who were born and grew up in the 80s and 90s and never saw the old Times Square, there are certain aspects that have been lost forever. There were a small handful of skyscrapers, but most of the district had very small scale, odd three and four story buildings. Light to the street was not as blocked as it is now, with the many skyscrapers that line Broadway and Seventh Avenue. Allowances were made to slap a couple of jaunty signs on the shins and ankles of these new buildings, but they still create the feeling of a shadowy canyon for pedestrians walking Times Square. It all looks very "Blade Runner" these days. But New York is ever changing (for better or worse) and one has to accept that things you love about it may not still be there 10, 20 or 30 years from now.
As much as the new Times Square is a safer, cleaner place to be and the theatre industry seems more robust than at the various low points of the 70s and mid 80s, I do miss the energy that the old Times Square had, and the rush of nervousness and excitement I used to feel walking the streets of Times Square. The only thing like it these days is San Francisco's Tenderloin - although there, I feared for my life in ways I never did in the heyday of "bad old Times Square".
Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end: then stop.