I'm not a very religious person, nor I'm a blind Christian, but it's not fair to question the faith of millions of Catholics around the world just because of the actions of a small elite portion of its people. Not fair? Who is supporting that "small elite"?
With all due respect, all that jazz, I didn't question anyone's faith per se. I do question the value of BLIND faith untempered by reason, but that has nothing to do with doubting anyone's sincerity. (And to be clear once again: I have my own non-rational beliefs, but I do recognize that faith and reason are not the same functions.)
I don't mind admitting that I love the Catholic mass and have attended semi-regularly throughout my adulthood. (I was raised in an evangelical denomination.)
But put a penny in the collection box? How can anyone do so in good conscience (except for those collections that are very rigidly devoted to one of the many good causes the Church supports)?
The issue raised by Sue, however, was whether criticism of a religious belief was analogous to racism, sexism or homophobia? The answer is still "No." The former is a choice and deserves criticism, not all the time but when it is harmful. The other prejudices are based on immutable characteristics.
***
ETA, all that jazz, I want to be clear that I don't condemn Catholics as a whole and I certainly don't exclude them from my circle of friends. I recognize that many are working to change the Church from within and I wish them nothing but success.
My point was really directed at sue's claim that criticizing the Church was somehow akin to racism. It may be to a few people, but to most of us, we condemn the Church hierarchy because of its actions, not because it is Catholic.
Updated On: 4/12/13 at 08:37 PM