#101
Posted: 3/5/14 at 8:28am
"I wonder if those who choose to musicalize certain films bother to ask themslves from the outset: does this film cry out for musicalization, or even lend itself to it ?"
That's what I was wondering when I went to see both Far From Heaven and Bridges of Madison County. I think they both do,"
The fact that you had initial doubts about the musicalization possibiliies of both these films indicates to me that indeed, they did not cry out for musicalization, even if you thought upon seeing them that were successfully musicalized. I don't think either one cried out for it, nor do I feel either was successful, or any of the musicals cut from the same cloth. And the problem is the songs themselves. You know exactly what you're going to get even before you go in: not songs really, but ruminations set to music, to uninteresting, unmemorable, and unengaging music, at that. Oh, yes, I know, on this board, a board of buffs, there are effusions galore about all these glorious songs that delineate character so penetratingly to orchestrations that shimmer and shine. But the problem is that the general theatregoing audience is not looking for the same things that make the buffs rejoice. They don't give a hoot in hell if the music undercuts Sally's words in In Buddy's Eyes. What they want to hear in a musical is music with a spark of life, music that engages them, eg. Les Mis, in a show that does the same. They're not interested in introspective anlyses set to colorless, monotonous music.
And maybe that's why these musicals can't bring in the crowds.
That's what I was wondering when I went to see both Far From Heaven and Bridges of Madison County. I think they both do,"
The fact that you had initial doubts about the musicalization possibiliies of both these films indicates to me that indeed, they did not cry out for musicalization, even if you thought upon seeing them that were successfully musicalized. I don't think either one cried out for it, nor do I feel either was successful, or any of the musicals cut from the same cloth. And the problem is the songs themselves. You know exactly what you're going to get even before you go in: not songs really, but ruminations set to music, to uninteresting, unmemorable, and unengaging music, at that. Oh, yes, I know, on this board, a board of buffs, there are effusions galore about all these glorious songs that delineate character so penetratingly to orchestrations that shimmer and shine. But the problem is that the general theatregoing audience is not looking for the same things that make the buffs rejoice. They don't give a hoot in hell if the music undercuts Sally's words in In Buddy's Eyes. What they want to hear in a musical is music with a spark of life, music that engages them, eg. Les Mis, in a show that does the same. They're not interested in introspective anlyses set to colorless, monotonous music.
And maybe that's why these musicals can't bring in the crowds.
