Band's Visit not worth 9 Tonys — Page 5

Oak2 said: "
The Band's Visit winning its awards does not in anyway invalidate my own opinions and tastes, so I can be happy that it found popularity and acclaim even if I do not like it. "

You haven't even seen it so your opinion is completely invalid.

Updated On: 6/12/18 at 11:22 AM

I really think STAN means "stupid fans."

KayGlass2 said: "For those whining...

Also, just...shut up. "I hate it when shows sweep it all" is an utterly ridiculous statement. Maybe it swept each category because it...deserved it?"



THIS ^ ^ ^....

...and to the whiners, get over it. :)

Flashy and in your face doesn’t necessarily mean BEST. Sometimes “subtle” is BEST.

“The Band’s Visit” was chosen BEST for a reason.

Time to move on folks.

Simón Bolívar said: "
And the irony is that the best play went to the most commercial of the lot. Just like in theme park ville. Universal is winning and Disney is loosing"

Course the difference is the Cursed Child is an original piece thats never been a movie and was written as a screen play. So while its from a franchise its very original.

Also its an amazing show all the way around. Didnt see the Band's Visit, saw Frozen and Mean Girls and didnt think either would win a Tony watching it. So wasn't overly surprised.

Impossible2 said: "Oak2 said: "
The Band's Visit winning its awards does not in anyway invalidate my own opinions and tastes, so I can be happy that it found popularity and acclaim even if I do not like it. "

You haven't even seen it so your opinion is completely invalid.

"Wrong. I am always allowed to judge something based on what is available to me before choosing whether it's worth spending money on, and am allowed to dislike what I've seen and heard.. It's ludicrous to say one has to travel many miles and spend hundreds on something they already dislike based on what's been seen and heard. Unless you're going to pay for my ticket, you are not going to force me to see something I know I will dislike. And you can never make me feel like my thoughts and opinions are invalid. I will always continue to voice them, no matter what you think of them.

Updated On: 6/12/18 at 07:32 PM

I must jump in and disagree about Tony Shalhoub star status. I think he is a much bigger star and known name than Tina Fey, mostly due to Monk. Monk was on for eight successful seasons, won him 3 Emmy awards and is popular all over the world, especially parts of Europe. He's a huge star in that regard not to mention one of the most gifted actors of his generation.

schubox said: "Some nasty posts in here. I can understand not liking it, but I don’t understand people’s need to tear it apart because of how successfull it was last night. A lot of negativity in here"

Ironically, at this point, the majority of the negativity and nasty posts on here aren't coming from the show's critics, but from its supporters.

Updated On: 6/12/18 at 09:32 PM

GeorgeandDot said: "Clearly people who knew what they were talking about didn't find it boring since it won 10 Tonys. Maybe you have a problem regarding your attention span."

If anyone has a problem here, I think it's you and your inability to understand that maybe, just MAYBE, people have different taste than you.

Mister Matt said: "I'm sorry, but anyone arguing that TBV winning 10 Tonys is anything other than a political statement from the ATW are wrong.

Because every voter told you personally how and why they voted for each winner?

It's very upsetting that while TBV is a wonderful, wonderful show, it took so much from other shows.

The show didn't take anything from any other show. All it did was accept the awards it was given.

This attitude that certain award resultsmust be indicative of a conspiracy is not only arrogance of a Trumpian sort, but use of such phrases as "more deserving" and "more worthy" is insulting to the recipients, who are blameless, and makes people sound like petulant bitter stans because the Tonys didn't do what they wanted."

Anyone who has followed Tony voting over an extended period of time knows full well that Tony voters cast their votes based on a variety of factors.

Although voters are supposed to see every show they vote on - I know of voters who leave shows early, or find some way not to see it at all.

Although votes should be secret, there are plenty of voters perfectly happy to share how they voted and why. If you doubt this - simply read the New York Times article on the subject.

So - were their "Protest Votes" - depending on your meaning of "Protest" - yes. And voters perfectly happy to explain their rationale. Resistance against corporate influence of Broadway was a common theme. While the political overtones of tolerance and resistance were subtle, they were these - and some those seeking affirmation of their beliefs regarding Middle Eastern events found refuge at TBV.

It is worth noting that there were also voters who simply chose not to vote for a "Best Musical" - which is not exactly a strong endorsement of TBV.

As for other categories - let's consider an easy one - Sound Design. Assuming you have seen TBV - and the show I believe should have won Sound Design - "Sponge Bob" - please let me know what was special about TBV's sound design. Besides "You didn't notice it" - because I DID notice Sponge Bob's - and it was brilliant. A "Sound FX guy was a member of a cast - on stage - and his work accompanied the cast throughout the show. Requiring flawless sound execution. Now THAT you DID notice. There were other moments of brilliance scattered across the Broadway landscape - this would have been the ideal year to "spread the wealth" - for Tony voters to carefully assess various performances and creative efforts and make well considered choices.

The one argument in favor of TBV winning Best Musical is that the competition this year was "extraordinarily ordinary" at best. With a limited lineup of new musicals to choose from, and nothing that would be characterized as a "Hit." Winners and contenders from previous years are enjoying greater success at the box office than most members of this year's stellar lineup. So - perhaps in some categories TBV was "the best" - among the lineup available. But every category? Uhhh - no. No Way.

That said, I have no dog in the hunt this year - congratulations to TBV. There is much to be said for a "Small Show" enjoying some recognition - it does give hope for a future in which Disney, Scott Rudin and Viacom won't completely control the Broadway landscape.

On we go . . .!

I do sometimes wish The Band's Visit was in a smaller theatre, like the Helen Hayes or something. It's never surprising to me that when people say that didn't like the show, they were often sitting in the mezzanine at the Barrymore. I haven't heard a single negative report from someone who saw it from the orchestra. Seems like distance really affects how you take in the show.

Updated On: 6/13/18 at 02:14 PM

BroadwayConcierge said: "I do sometimes wishThe Band's Visitwas in a smaller theatre, like the Helen Hayes or something. It's never surprising to me that when people say that didn't like the show, they were often sitting in the mezzanine at the Barrymore. I haven't heard a single negative report from someone who saw it from the orchestra. Seems like distance really affects how you take in the show."





We sat front row center mezzanine (perfect) and loved it!

Well, I must congratulate you on having direct access into the minds of the majority of Tony voters. Golf claps!

I knew a Tony voter who didn't attend all the shows, either, In fact, he told me Aida won Best Score because he believed it was the "only true Broadway" score that season. Did I assume that was the majority opinion of all voters? No, because I don't generalize the voters and pronounce my assumptions to be absolute. Like Trump, I knew that he was a wealthy delusional a-hole with high-profile financial relationships who pretended to know about his field while relying on underpaid grunts to actually do everything.

You think adding a sound-effects guy on stage deserves a Tony for Sound Design. I don't because I found the sound effects more annoying than interesting or effective and I've seen enough "radio broadcast" productions of shows from amateur to Equity doing the same thing as well or better. Does that translate to a vote for TBV as an anti-commerical-corporate conspiracy? It sounds like you'd say it automatically does because you may have heard or read about a handful of Tony voters who are press hounds jabbering about their biases. The exact same conspiracy we hear about every time a "little-show-that-could" wins Best Musical.

The one argument in favor of TBV winning Best Musical is that the competition this year was "extraordinarily ordinary" at best.

Yeah, that's the sort of arrogance I was talking about. If you're going to be so reductive about the award as rationale for a minority opinion, then the award truly should have no meaning to you for any season because all musicals only have the season in which they perform for a shot at the prize, regardless the opinion of the season itself. Like every other year in Tony history (except 1960, which was a tie), the Best Musical winner won because it received the most votes. Speculating about how a show would have fared against other shows in other seasons doesn't support anything other than speculation. Saying "Well, Kismet wouldn't have won if it were up against Sweeney Todd, Sunday in the Park With George, Follies and A Little Night Music!" doesn't really prove any point. It's really just snark.

Not unfair, but possibly an impossible thing to do in the case of quiet and subtle.

As I've mentioned: first time I saw it I was in the last row of the mezz. I still liked it immensely, walked out KNOWING I wanted to see it again. 2nd time I was in the front mezz - and yes, I liked it more for many of the reasons being talked about (and that I got to see Shalhoub this time.)

In this case, I can see how it could make a very big difference in enjoyment. I can only begin to imagine how it would play in the Helen Hayes or off b'way.